2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11112960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Point Defects on Electronic Structure of Monolayer GeS

Abstract: Using density functional theory calculations, atomic and electronic structure of defects in monolayer GeS were investigated by focusing on the effects of vacancies and substitutional atoms. We chose group IV or chalcogen elements as substitutional ones, which substitute for Ge or S in GeS. It was found that the bandgap of GeS with substitutional atoms is close to that of pristine GeS, while the bandgap of GeS with Ge or S vacancies was smaller than that of pristine GeS. In terms of formation energy, monolayer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the low vaporization temperature of Se, the chemical environment during γ-GeSe synthesis is likely to be Se-rich, which further lowers the formation energy of the Ge vacancies. Figure S7a compares the vacancy formation energies in Ge monochalcogenides from the literatures. Overall, the formation energy of Ge vacancies was smaller than that of chalcogen vacancies for all monochalcogenides. Moreover, as shown in Figure S7a, the significantly lower formation energy of Ge vacancies is attributed to both γ-GeSe and GeTe, which provides strong evidence that the highly p-doped behavior shared by γ-GeSe and GeTe can be attributed to Ge vacancies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Owing to the low vaporization temperature of Se, the chemical environment during γ-GeSe synthesis is likely to be Se-rich, which further lowers the formation energy of the Ge vacancies. Figure S7a compares the vacancy formation energies in Ge monochalcogenides from the literatures. Overall, the formation energy of Ge vacancies was smaller than that of chalcogen vacancies for all monochalcogenides. Moreover, as shown in Figure S7a, the significantly lower formation energy of Ge vacancies is attributed to both γ-GeSe and GeTe, which provides strong evidence that the highly p-doped behavior shared by γ-GeSe and GeTe can be attributed to Ge vacancies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%