2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b09001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Polymer Binders on UV-Responsive Organic Thin-Film Phototransistors with Benzothienobenzothiophene Semiconductor

Abstract: The influence of polymer binders on the UV response of organic thin-film phototransistors (OTF-PTs) is reported. The active channel of the OTF-PTs was fabricated by blending a UV responsive 2,7-dipenty-[1]benzothieno[2,3-b][1]benzothiophene (C5-BTBT) as small molecule semiconductor and a branched unsaturated polyester (B-upe) as dielectric binder (ratio 1:1). To understand the influence of the polymer composition on the photoelectrical properties and UV response of C5-BTBT, control blends were prepared using c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron. The responsivity (R C ) of the present semitransparent OFETs reached ≈2.4 mA W −1 (Ag: 15 nm) and ≈3.1 mA W −1 (Ag: 20 nm) (note that a commercialized silicon photodiode without any optical transparency normally shows ≈123.73 mA W −1 at the UV light intensity of ≈1049.627 mW cm −2 (365 nm) [41][42][43][44] ). 2017, 3, 1700162 the higher resistance for the thinner Ag electrodes.…”
Section: Wwwadvelectronicmatdementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Electron. The responsivity (R C ) of the present semitransparent OFETs reached ≈2.4 mA W −1 (Ag: 15 nm) and ≈3.1 mA W −1 (Ag: 20 nm) (note that a commercialized silicon photodiode without any optical transparency normally shows ≈123.73 mA W −1 at the UV light intensity of ≈1049.627 mW cm −2 (365 nm) [41][42][43][44] ). 2017, 3, 1700162 the higher resistance for the thinner Ag electrodes.…”
Section: Wwwadvelectronicmatdementioning
confidence: 77%
“…When the devices were in the off-state under a sub-threshold voltage, the I photo /I dark ratio increased with the increase in gate voltage, owing to the increased photocurrent with a contribution from the positively shifted threshold voltage. When the phototransistors were turned on by applying more negative gate voltages, a significant decrease in the I photo / I dark ratio could be observed; the ratio disparities of the devices, caused by the different illumination intensities, rapidly diminished, as the electrical contribution to the charge carrier generation was dominant after the threshold was reached [ 48 , 49 ]. The maximum I photo / I dark ratio significantly increased with the incident illumination power increased; it could reach a value as high as 2.2 × 10 6 under a gate voltage around − 30 V when the power density of the white light was 10 mW cm −2 , as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely reported in the literature that UV and IR illumination ultimately affects the properties of the materials and ultimately the device response too [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] . The effect from the UV and IR illumination could be reversible (concerning physical properties) or irreversible (concerning structures).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%