2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00192-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of polystyrene particles on lung microvascular permeability in isolated perfused rabbit lungs: role of size and surface properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These devices were also used to help in the understanding of health effects associated with exposure to combustion generated particles. In addition, these devices were used in fundamental aerosol research on particle generation and growth (Donaldson, Li, & MacNee, 1998;Hamoir et al, 2003;Kim & Choi, 2003;Ku & Maynard, 2005;Pui & Chen, 1997;Wegner & Pratsinis, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices were also used to help in the understanding of health effects associated with exposure to combustion generated particles. In addition, these devices were used in fundamental aerosol research on particle generation and growth (Donaldson, Li, & MacNee, 1998;Hamoir et al, 2003;Kim & Choi, 2003;Ku & Maynard, 2005;Pui & Chen, 1997;Wegner & Pratsinis, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do recognize that there exists significant evidence that particle toxicity is dependent on size, due to differences in particle surface area and solubility (1,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). It is also the case, however, that for ambient air, differences in actual chemical composition between smaller and larger particles adds a further safety concern that is not as relevant for inhalation drug products.…”
Section: Assessing Safety Of Foreign Particles In Specified Size Rangesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PM characteristics described above, namely ultra-small size, ultra-low concentrations and carboneous content of the aerosol have made direct detection of particles inhaled under natural conditions impossible to date. Due to strong analytical limitations the majority of PM health effect investigations are based on techniques that use intratracheal instillation instead of inhalation, and even when inhalation takes place, PM concentrations are much greater than 100 mg m À3 (Table 1) (Glover et al, 2008;Nemmar et al, 2001Nemmar et al, , 2002aTakenaka et al, 2001;Oberd€ orster, 2001b;Ferin et al, 1992;Oberdorster et al, 1994;Geiser et al, 2005;Oberd€ orster et al, 2002bOberd€ orster et al, , 2004Oberd€ orster et al, , 1992Simon et al, 1995a;Simon et al, 1995b;Ercan et al, 1991;Gibaud et al, 1996;Nemmar et al, 2002bNemmar et al, , 2003Hamoir et al, 2003;Silva et al, 2005;Kato et al, 2003;Gibaud et al, 1994Gibaud et al, , 1998. In Table 1 we tried to summarize available data on the detection studies of model aerosols in living organisms showing the main problems of particle detection which force the researchers to use high particle doses or inadequate injection routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric monodisperse beads seem to be prospective model for aerosol investigations due to the following properties: organic matter, low biodegradability, controllable size from several nm to several mm, possibility of surface modification by negative (eCOOH) or positive (eNH 2 ) functional groups, as well as by designing coreshell structures with desirable chemistry. The attraction of polymeric beads, predominantly polystyrene (PS) ones, affects the number of studies using this technique (Table 1) Simon et al, 1995aSimon et al, , 1995bErcan et al, 1991;Gibaud et al, 1996;Nemmar et al, 2002bNemmar et al, , 2003Hamoir et al, 2003;Silva et al, 2005;Kato et al, 2003;Gibaud et al, 1994Gibaud et al, , 1998, but again there are some problems in particle registration. When the direct method is used for particle detection, for example, different kinds of microscopy, one has to raise the dose so that intratracheal instillation or intravenous administration is used instead of inhalation (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation