2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999gl008414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pore and confining pressures on VP in thermally pre‐cracked granites

Abstract: Abstract. The acoustic P-waves velocity Vp is measured in a water saturated fine-grained granite as a function of pore pressure for a series of confining pressures ranging from 10 to 75 MPa. Prior to Vp measurements, different crack contents were generated in the granite specimens by means of controlled thermal pre-treatments at 450, 510, and 555øC. Vp variations are interpreted as resulting from crack behaviour evolution in response to imposed pressures. An effective pressure law with an effective pressure co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic velocities are generally expected to decrease with increasing pore pressure. The precise influence of porosity on seismic velocities is complicated by the shape, distribution, and connectivity of pores and the presence of cracks and fractures, and few experiments exist that infer this relation (e.g., Christensen, ; Darot & Reuschlé, ; Todd & Simmons, ; Yu et al, ). We parameterize the decrease in V P as a function of porosity using the relation suggested by Wyllie et al (): 1V=ϕVfluid+1ϕVP. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic velocities are generally expected to decrease with increasing pore pressure. The precise influence of porosity on seismic velocities is complicated by the shape, distribution, and connectivity of pores and the presence of cracks and fractures, and few experiments exist that infer this relation (e.g., Christensen, ; Darot & Reuschlé, ; Todd & Simmons, ; Yu et al, ). We parameterize the decrease in V P as a function of porosity using the relation suggested by Wyllie et al (): 1V=ϕVfluid+1ϕVP. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, although there are many studies of velocity and anisotropy for measurements under controlled pore pressure conditions for porous reservoir rocks [e.g., Wyllie et al, 1958], there are very few studies for crystalline rocks of middle and lower crust [e.g., Todd and Simmons, 1972;Christensen, 1984;Darot and Reusché, 2000]. For crystalline low-porosity rocks the major control on the velocity is the effective pressure P e = P c À n P p , where P c is the confining pressure and P p is pore fluid pressure and n is the effective pore pressure coefficient, which is typically less than 1 (note the difference of P c and P C , the latter which is defined as the crack closure pressure).…”
Section: 1002/2016rg000552mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, when it comes to the V P pressure sensitivity, end members might outweigh the contribution of composition and Φ. Assuming that the grains remain intact, it is commonly accepted that increase in V P due to loading is mainly due to the closure of cracks and grain boundaries (Darot and Reuschlé, 2000;Freund, 1992;Prasad and Manghnani, 1997) or change in grain arrangement (Kitamura et al, 2010). In this context, the role of microporosity (pores smaller than what Optical Light Microscopy can discern; ∼30 μm; Baechle et al, 2008) seems to be critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%