1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19980701)36:2<80::aid-pros2>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of postnecrotic and alcoholic hepatic cirrhosis on development of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with previous studies which found that cirrhotic patients have significantly lower PSA levels than men with normal liver function 2122. Furthermore, liver dysfunction, which has been shown to influence the development of BPH, is associated with smaller prostate size 23. This association between liver function and prostate size may further contribute to lower PSA levels in men with hepatic dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in agreement with previous studies which found that cirrhotic patients have significantly lower PSA levels than men with normal liver function 2122. Furthermore, liver dysfunction, which has been shown to influence the development of BPH, is associated with smaller prostate size 23. This association between liver function and prostate size may further contribute to lower PSA levels in men with hepatic dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the restoration of normal hepatocellular functions by liver transplantation did not modify serum PSA level [24]. Conversely, a slight decrease in PSA was described in relation to a decrease in testosterone and an increase in the estradiol/free testosterone ratio in cirrhotic male patients [25]. Globally, PSA remains a reliable prostate tumor marker in patients with chronic liver diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Frea et al reported that the prevalence of BPH in patients with cirrhosis was 41% whereas that in controls was 71% [ 18 ]. Mesut et al demonstrated that the mean prostate volume was 17.9 ± 6.8 cm 3 in patients with cirrhosis (n = 60) whereas it was 27.6 ± 8.6 cm 3 in controls (n = 20) [ 19 ]. These results could be partly explained by the fact that the prostatic epithelium responds to androgens, the level of which is reduced in patients with cirrhosis [ 18 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesut et al demonstrated that the mean prostate volume was 17.9 ± 6.8 cm 3 in patients with cirrhosis (n = 60) whereas it was 27.6 ± 8.6 cm 3 in controls (n = 20) [ 19 ]. These results could be partly explained by the fact that the prostatic epithelium responds to androgens, the level of which is reduced in patients with cirrhosis [ 18 19 ]. This was consistent with the finding in our study that the prostate volume in the baseline CT was larger in patients without liver dysfunction (26.9 ± 9.1 cm 3 ) when compared to those with liver dysfunction (22.4 ± 14.7 cm 3 ), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.178).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%