Effect of production factors on maize yield and yield stability

Sárvári, Mihály; Pepó, Péter

doi:10.1556/crc.2014.0009

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2016, a 16% gap was recorded in terms of the significant 60:46:54 NPK ha -1 treatment and the 150:115:135 NPK ha -1 treatment, which provided the highest yield. The obtained result confirms the findings of Sárvári and Pepó (2014), i.e., the optimum fertiliser dose depends on weather circumstances.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…Various research results show that production technological interventions need to be in harmony with each other (El-Hendawy and Schmidhalter, 2010;Wang et al, 2011), while different technological elements have different impact on maize yield (Sárvári and Pepó, 2014). The most significant influencing factor is fertilization; it is even more important than the variety itself and the other effects of cultivation (Berzsenyi and Dang, 2008;Nagy 2008).…”

Section: The Impact Of Environmental Factors On the Protein Content Amentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The impact of environmental factors on the protein content and yield of maize grain at different nutrient supply levels

Széles

Horváth²,

Vad³

et al. 2018

Emir J Food Agric

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate change poses a new challenge for maize producers which calls for the re-thinking of each production technological element. Professional nutrient replenishment may represent an alternative for the mitigation of yield decrease caused by climate change by means of improving yield stability from the aspect of global food safety, as well as increasing yield and improving yield quality. In the course of a six-year (2011-2016) research, under changing climatic conditions we studied how different fertilization methods - 11 different N doses (0-300 kg ha-1) - affect the productivity of maize and protein content of grains.The experiment was carried out in Hungary (47o 33’ N, 21o 26’ E, asl: 111 m) in the long-term experiment of the University of Debrecen.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: The Impact Of Environmental Factors On the Protein Content Amentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of environmental factors on the protein content and yield of maize grain at different nutrient supply levels

Széles

Horváth²,

Vad³

et al. 2018

Emir J Food Agric

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This condition was caused by the maize variety had different ability in using the growth space and adaptation process to environment. The number of maize leaves was affected by genetic and environmental factors [15,16]. The use of 2 varieties caused the potency of number of leaves were not significantly different.…”

Section: Number Of Leavesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Plant Spacing to Growth and Yield of Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.)

Dwipa

Karmaini

Suliansyah

2020

ARJA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problem: Maize is one of important food for Indonesian people. The problem faced by Indonesian government is the maize is not sufficient to suffice the this country demand. Aims: The research aimed to study the interaction between several hybrid maize varieties and plant spacing to growth and yield of hybrid maize Study Design: Factorial design in randomized block design. Place and Duration of Study: The research was conducted in Siguntur, Sitiung 1, Dharmasraya, West Sumatra and Indonesia from April to July 2018. Methodology: Factorial design in randomized block design with 2 factors was used in the assay. The first factor was hybrid maize varieties (Pioneer P35 and Pertiwi 3) and the second factor was planting space (75 cm x 20 cm, 75 cm x 30 cm and 75 cm x 40 cm). The data was analyzed by ANOVA. Results: The result showed that no interaction between planting spacing and varieties to growth and yield of maize. The best hybrid maize variety for growth and yield was Pioneer 35. The best planting space for growth and yield was 75 cm x 20 cm. Conclusion: The interaction between plant spacing and hybrid maize varieties did not affect the growth and yield of hybrid maize. Recommendation: The further research are recommended to study the effect of plant spacing and hybrid maize to growth and yield of maize.

show abstract

“…Fertilizer use plays an important role in increasing the yield of maize (Árendás, 2006;Sárvári and Pepó, 2014;Pepó, 2017). In particular, nitrogen fertilizer is a key element (Evenson and Gollin, 2003;Szulc et al, 2016) as it greatly influences the biomass and grain yield due to the development and durability of the leaf area (Muchow, 1998;Miao et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of crop years and nitrogen basal and top dressing on the yield of different maize genotypes and marginal revenue

Széles¹,

Kovács²,

Ferencsik³

2019

Időjárás

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of the amount and application date of nitrogen fertilizer on maize productivity and profitability was examined in a field experiment established on calcareous chernozem soil at the University of Debrecen in Hungary (47 o 33' N, 21 o 26' E, 111 m) under different environmental conditions in the wet crop year of 2016 and the average crop year of 2017. In addition to the non-fertilized treatment, N fertilizer doses were applied in the form of basal and top dressing. The 60 and 120 kg N ha -1 treatments applied as spring basal dressing were followed by two occasions of 30 kg N ha -1 top dressing at the V6 and V12 phenophases each. The longer maturity hybrid Armagnac (FAO 490) had a better conversion ratio concerning the precipitation during the growing season of 2016 (which was higher than the 30-year average), as well as the basal and top dressing (averaged over the different treatments) in comparison with the shorter maturity hybrid Renfor (FAO 320). In the wet crop year, the yield of Armagnac was 21.7% higher, while that of Renfor was 10.4% higher. The 60 kg N ha -1 basal dressing and the +30 kg N ha -1 top dressing at the V6 phenophase (V6 90 ) resulted in more efficient uptake and better conversion rate in the rainy crop year (2016) in the case of both examined hybrids. In the average crop year (2017), a difference was observed in the successfulness of top dressing. In the case of the Armagnac hybrid (FAO 490), top dressing did not cause any significant yield surplus and the 120 kg N ha -1 basal dressing was shown to be successful. In the case of the Renfor hybrid (FAO 320), the early top dressing (V6 150 ) applied on the basal dressing of 120 kg N ha -1 was favorable. The most favorable income of nutrient management (N) was provided by the basal dressing of 120 kg N ha -1 and the +30 kg N ha -1 (V6 150 ) top dressing applied at the early V6 phenophase, averaged over the examined hybrids and years. In the case of the Renfor hybrid (FAO 320), the highest profitability was reached with the V6 150 treatment, independently of the prevailing environmental factors. However, as regards the Armagnac (FAO 490) hybrid, the top dressing applied at the V12 phenophase provided the highest profitability, which could be achieved with the lowest dose of V12 120 treatment in the wet year (2016) and the highest dose of V12 180 in the average crop year (2017). Altogether, based on the results of yield and marginal revenue analysis, the recommended fertilization technology is basal dressing of 120 kg N ha -1 and basal dressing of +30 kg N ha -1 (V6 150 ) applied at the early V6 phenophase. The obtained findings also show that the effect of N is greatly affected by crop year, genotype, and other elements of the applied technology. Also, marginal efficiency has to be defined for each hybrid, considering the given crop year, too.

show abstract

Effect of production factors on maize yield and yield stability

Cited by 16 publications

References 8 publications

The impact of environmental factors on the protein content and yield of maize grain at different nutrient supply levels

The impact of environmental factors on the protein content and yield of maize grain at different nutrient supply levels

Effect of Plant Spacing to Growth and Yield of Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.)

The effect of crop years and nitrogen basal and top dressing on the yield of different maize genotypes and marginal revenue

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About