1982
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of prolactin on urinary excretion and renal haemodynamics in conscious rats.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Conscious rats received a saline infusion (5-8 ml. hr-') via a tail vein, for a 6 hr period. For the final 2 hr of this infusion period, prolactin (74 ,tg (100 g body wt.)-'. hr-1) was incorporated in the infusate. A control group of animals continued to receive saline alone.2. In the first hour of prolactin administration (in comparison with the control group), urine flow, sodium output and osmolal output were all significantly reduced (P < 0-02); there was also a reduction (P < 0-05) in renal plasm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, g.f.r. has been seen to increase (Lockett, 1965;MacCallum et al 1975;Riley, Hagen & Stefaniak, 1978), decrease (Bliss & Lote, 1982) or remain unchanged (Lucci et al 1975;Wallin & Lee, 1976) following acute hormone treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, g.f.r. has been seen to increase (Lockett, 1965;MacCallum et al 1975;Riley, Hagen & Stefaniak, 1978), decrease (Bliss & Lote, 1982) or remain unchanged (Lucci et al 1975;Wallin & Lee, 1976) following acute hormone treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results of the prolactin infusion studies add to the controversy surrounding a potential osmoregulatory role for prolactin in mammals. Whereas many workers have demonstrated an acute salt and water retaining action for the hormone (Lockett & Nail, 1965;Horrobin, Lloyd, Lipton, Burstyn, Durkin & Muiruri, 1971 ;Lucci et al 1975;Miller & Van Gemert, 1976;Wallin & Lee, 1976;Bliss & Lote, 1982), others have failed to show this (MacCallum, Simpson & Auld, 1975;Baumann & Loriaux, 1976;Berl, Brautbar, Ben-David, Czaczkes & Kleeman, 1976). Moreover, g.f.r.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflex sympathetic stimulation secondary to peripheral vasodilatation may produce renal vasoconstriction, but this seems unlikely since VIP-induced renin release is not blocked by propranolol (Calam et al 1982). Systemic VIP is known to raise plasma prolactin levels (Fahrenkrug & Emson, 1982) and in physiological concentrations, prolactin has been shown to reduce renal perfusion and increase renal vascular resistance (Bliss & Lote, 1982). In contrast, Porter et al (1980) have reported a rise in renal blood flow during intrarenal VIP infusion in anaesthetized dogs, but increased sympathetic tone during anaesthesia (Price, 1966) is likely to alter vascular reactivity to vasoactive substances such as VIP (Uddman et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is conceivable that neurotensin alters dopaminergic activity peripherally and perhaps even centrally. It may influence sympathetic nervous function and release of other hormones such as prolactin (Brown & Vale, 1977), thus affecting UNaV, GFR and PRA (Bliss & Lote, 1982). Furthermore, neurotensin immunoreactivity has been demonstrated within renal peptidergic nerves (Forssmann, Hock & Metz, 1982) and neurotensin may act directly to alter intrarenal blood flow or tubular function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%