2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859607007290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pruning on growth, leaf yield and pod yields of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus(L.) Moench)

Abstract: SU MMARYYoung leaves and pods of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) are edible, and so a crop management strategy for removing edible leaves while sustaining good pod yields is required. Pruning treatments were imposed on apically debudded okra plants for 3 years to assess effects of removing a quarter, half or three-quarters of the primary branches on growth and fresh leaf and pod yields. Pruning significantly (P<0 . 05) delayed fruiting by 8-10 days, extended length of harvest duration by 12-15 days a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This is consistent with findings in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), where apical bud removal is applied in combination with leaf removal to prolong the growing period (Olasantan & Salau 2008).…”
Section: Canopy Developmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1). This is consistent with findings in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), where apical bud removal is applied in combination with leaf removal to prolong the growing period (Olasantan & Salau 2008).…”
Section: Canopy Developmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, leaf area on the plant with 5 branches was higher than plants without pruning. This is in line with Olasantan and Salau (2008) that stated that pruning led to an increase in leaf area of okra and the increasing of leaf area depended on the severity of the pruning. The increase in leaf area was caused by the mechanism of the plant to compensate the lost of leaf due to pruning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Numbers of fully-expanded leaves were counted. Leaf area was estimated by the non-destructive method of Olasantan and Salau (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%