2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on mandibular fracture healing: A randomized control trial, (RCT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the outcome of pain, when we omitted the trial performed by Mohajerani et al [2019], I 2 changed from 60% to 0% but the merger effect size remains unchanged, suggesting that the research by Mohajerani et al [2019] is the main source of heterogeneity. Omitting any trial did not change the results of meta‐analysis, suggesting that the result is robust and PEMF intervention can significantly relieve pain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the outcome of pain, when we omitted the trial performed by Mohajerani et al [2019], I 2 changed from 60% to 0% but the merger effect size remains unchanged, suggesting that the research by Mohajerani et al [2019] is the main source of heterogeneity. Omitting any trial did not change the results of meta‐analysis, suggesting that the result is robust and PEMF intervention can significantly relieve pain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three trials reported BMD. Mohajerani et al [2019] reported PEMF did not increase BMD after 2 weeks of intervention, but increased BMD at 28 days of follow‐up. Yang and Yang [2005] reported that BMD of collum femoris was higher than that of control after intervention of 1 month ( P < 0.01), 2 months ( P < 0.01), and 3 months ( P < 0.01), and BMD of lumbar vertebra was also higher than that of control after intervention of 1 month ( P < 0.05), 2 months ( P < 0.05), and 3 months ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Під впливом постійного та змінного імпульсного магнітного поля відзначається посилення метаболічних процесів в ділянці кісткового регенерату, в більш ранні терміни з'являються фібро-та остеобласти в ділянці регенерації, процес утворення кісткової речовини проходить інтенсивніше та у більш ранні терміни [45][46][47][48]. У низці досліджень на тваринах доведено, що магнітотерапії властива седативна, гіпотензивна, протизапальна, протинабрякова, знеболююча і трофіко-регенеративна дія [4,49,50]. На противагу, Rosso F. et al, 2015 [51] не виявили статистично достовірних доказів ефективності магнітотерапії у порівнянні з ЕУХТ.…”
Section: електрична стимуляціяunclassified
“…У царині щелепно-лицевої хірургії серед потенційних показань до застосування магнітотерапії виокремлюють: захворювання пародонту; гострий артрит СНЩС; переломи нижньої щелепи; післяопераційні рани та травми [44,49]. Проте, відкритим залишається питання щодо використання магнітотерапії за наявності металевих конструкцій у порожнині рота [44,39].…”
Section: електрична стимуляціяunclassified
“…It is not yet entirely clear, however, whether the effects of ELF-EMFs on the human body is beneficial or harmful. It was found that ELF-EMFs have significant effects on cells and tissues and their functions in the living organisms, such as a marked change in the synaptic plasticity generated in synapses of the dentate gyrus (Komaki et al, 2014); persistent changes in neuronal activity after prolonged exposure to ELF-EMFs (Komaki et al, 2014); dramatic effects from behaviour to physiology and protein expression (Wyszkowska et al, 2016); important alterations of glucose and lipid metabolisms (Hashish et al, 2008); deleterious effect on ultra structure of prostate gland in rat (Khaki et al, 2008); the occurrence of oxidative stress-based nervous system pathologies associated with ageing (Falone et al, 2008); regulation of calcium-related activities in cardiomyocytes (Wei et al, 2015); absence of evidence of persisting unrepaired nuclear DNA single-strand breaks in distinct types of cells in the brain, kidney and liver of adult mice after continuous 8-week 50 Hz magnetic field (MF) exposure with flux density of 0.1 or 1.0 mT (Korr et al, 2014); changes in the synthesis and release of oestradiol-17β (E2) in uterine tissues (Koziorowska et al, 2018); the treatment of cerebral ischaemia by reduction neuronal cell death by low-energy low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) (Gessi et al, 2019); increased bone density, faster recovery, increased formation of new bone, a further opening of the mouth and decreased pain depending on the post-operative PEMF treatment with 1 mT intensity and 40 Hz frequency in mandibular bone fractures (Mohajerani et al, 2019); and the improvement of pain intensity, disability and lumbar range of motion in PEMF exposure with 20 Gauss low intensity, 50 Hz frequency in patients with non-chronic specific low back pain (Elshiwi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%