2015
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2014.2375214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Receptor Density and Size on Signal Reception in Molecular Communication via Diffusion With an Absorbing Receiver

Abstract: The performance of molecular communication is significantly impacted by the reception process of the messenger molecules. The receptors' size and density, however, have yet to be investigated. In this letter, we analyze the effect of receptor density and size on the signal reception of an absorbing receiver with receptors. The results show that, when the total receptor area is the same, better hitting probability is achieved by using a higher number of relatively small receptors. In addition, deploying recepto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, P x (t), x ∈ {A, B}, depends on the release mechanism at the transmitter, the MC environment, and the properties of the receiver such as its size, the number of receptors, etc. For instance, assuming instantaneous molecule release and a point source transmitter, expressions for P x (t) can be found in [19] for a general reactive receiver and in [5] for an absorbing receiver. On the other hand, the external noise molecules originate from other MC links or natural sources which also employ type-A or type-B molecules.…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, P x (t), x ∈ {A, B}, depends on the release mechanism at the transmitter, the MC environment, and the properties of the receiver such as its size, the number of receptors, etc. For instance, assuming instantaneous molecule release and a point source transmitter, expressions for P x (t) can be found in [19] for a general reactive receiver and in [5] for an absorbing receiver. On the other hand, the external noise molecules originate from other MC links or natural sources which also employ type-A or type-B molecules.…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully-absorbing Receiver: For fully-absorbing receivers [73], [74], [64], [75], [22], [76], [77] (also referred to as perfect sinks), unlike the passive receiver model, the physical and chemical properties of the receiver geometry are taken into account. In particular, the signaling A molecules that reach the receiver via diffusion are absorbed as soon as they hit the receiver surface, see Fig.…”
Section: B Receiver Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5: For a fully-absorbing receiver, it is implicitly assumed that the whole surface of the receiver is fullyabsorbing. The extension of this model to the case where the receiver surface is partially covered by fully absorbing receptor patches is considered in [74]. Moreover, the extension of the fully-absorbing receiver to take the impact of degradation and production noise into account, is considered in [64].…”
Section: B Receiver Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by applying (14) and (15) in (16), it is easy to find a relationship between the release rate and λ * a . In addition, by using the Little's law [64], it is immediate to find that the mean number of busy receptors (servers) in the system is given by λ * a T tra f f , and the desired fraction f results equal to the overall utilization coefficient ρ, which is equal to…”
Section: Application To Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, receptors saturation affects drug delivery and disease modeling [13]. However, most of research in the molecular communications either neglect the presence of individual receptors (absorbing receiver [14]), or neglect the absorption time of molecules (absorbing receptors [15]). A more accurate model, which partially addresses these shortcomings by modeling molecules absorption via receptors with a birth-death Markov process, is presented in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%