1990
DOI: 10.14214/sf.a15563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of refertilization of pine and birch stands on a drained fertile mire.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible that nutrients were not largely limiting growth, and that the fertilization had a less extreme effect than if applied to a nutrient-limited site [63]. This is in line with Paavilainen [13], who also encountered a weak response to fertilization of birch on a fertile site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is possible that nutrients were not largely limiting growth, and that the fertilization had a less extreme effect than if applied to a nutrient-limited site [63]. This is in line with Paavilainen [13], who also encountered a weak response to fertilization of birch on a fertile site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previously published information about the response of birch to fertilization is inconsistent. Paavilainen [13] remarked that birch usually has a positive response to fertilization, but it was smaller than the response of conifers. Hoyle and Bjorkbom [14] also reported an increase in birch growth after fertilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%