2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Hand Motor Cortical Area on Central Pain After Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
87
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Three RCTs in SCI-related NP compared the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham therapy. [54][55][56] Two of these trials found no significant difference in reduction in pain intensity. 54,55 The evidence quality of the third trial, which found a significant improvement in pain intensity after treatment, was downgraded because of wide confidence intervals.…”
Section: ) Treatments With Low-quality Evidence Of Positive Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three RCTs in SCI-related NP compared the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham therapy. [54][55][56] Two of these trials found no significant difference in reduction in pain intensity. 54,55 The evidence quality of the third trial, which found a significant improvement in pain intensity after treatment, was downgraded because of wide confidence intervals.…”
Section: ) Treatments With Low-quality Evidence Of Positive Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54][55][56] Two of these trials found no significant difference in reduction in pain intensity. 54,55 The evidence quality of the third trial, which found a significant improvement in pain intensity after treatment, was downgraded because of wide confidence intervals. 56 2) Treatments with evidence of positive effect in populations other than SCI The SC evaluated several therapies with evidence of pain reduction in non-SCI populations, including cannabinoids, duloxetine and intrathecal clonidine.…”
Section: ) Treatments With Low-quality Evidence Of Positive Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В трех исследо-ваниях (50 пациентов) при стимуляции зоны М1 была по-казана неэффективность высокочастотной рТМС [77,78,80]. Однако в этих работах использовалась круглая катуш-ка, которая не обеспечивает локального воздействия на стимулируемую зону [81].…”
Section: болевые синдромыunclassified
“…In SCI, rTMS has been used primarily for the purpose of modifying neuropathic pain and has been successful in some instances [102,103] but not others [103]. Very high-frequency (~20 Hz) rTMS bursts separated by long inter-burst intervals (28 seconds) delivered over M1 can improve spasticity for up to one week following stimulation in SCI [104].…”
Section: Paired Associative Stimulation (Pas)mentioning
confidence: 99%