Effect of Rifampicin and CYP2B6 Genotype on Long-Term Efavirenz Autoinduction and Plasma Exposure in HIV Patients With or Without Tuberculosis

Efavirenz pharmacokinetics is characterized by large between-subject variability, which determines both therapeutic response and adverse effects. Some of the variability in efavirenz pharmacokinetics has been attributed to genetic variability in cytochrome P450 genes that alter efavirenz metabolism, such as CYP2B6 and CYP2A6. While the effects of additional patient factors have been studied, such as sex, weight, and body mass index, the extent to which they contribute to variability in efavirenz exposure is inconsistently reported. The aim of this analysis was to develop a pharmacometric model to quantify the contribution of genetic and nongenetic factors to efavirenz pharmacokinetics. A population-based pharmacokinetic model was developed using 1,132 plasma efavirenz concentrations obtained from 73 HIV-seronegative volunteers administered a single oral dose of 600 mg efavirenz. A two-compartment structural model with absorption occurring by zero-and firstorder processes described the data. Allometric scaling adequately described the relationship between fat-free mass and apparent oral clearance, as well as fat mass and apparent peripheral volume of distribution. Inclusion of fat-free mass and fat mass in the model mechanistically accounted for correlation between these disposition parameters and sex, weight, and body mass index. Apparent oral clearance of efavirenz was reduced by 25% and 51% in subjects predicted to have intermediate and slow CYP2B6 metabolizer status, respectively. The final pharmacokinetic model accounting for fat-free mass, fat mass, and CYP2B6 metabolizer status was consistent with known mechanisms of efavirenz disposition, efavirenz physiochemical properties, and pharmacokinetic theory. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00668395.) KEYWORDS body composition, cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6), efavirenz, population pharmacokinetics E favirenz is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is used in combination with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors to treat HIVinfected individuals older than 3 years who are naive to antiretroviral drugs. Due to its proven efficacy and low cost relative to newer antiretrovirals, efavirenz-based therapy remains the preferred first-line regimen in many low-income nations and is consequently one of the most commonly prescribed antiretroviral drugs (1). Efavirenz pharmacokinetics (PK) is characterized by large interindividual variability in plasma concentrations following a single dose (2, 3) and during chronic administration (4), which has important clinical implications. During the induction phase, efavirenz exposure is associated with central nervous system and psychiatric adverse events, liver enzyme elevation, and rash, among others (5, 6). This may result in increasing rates of

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling To Estimate the Contributions of Genetic and Nongenetic Factors to Efavirenz Disposition

Robarge

Metzger

et al. 2017

“…It is not clear whether efavirenz affects the NAT metabolic pathway of PAS. Efavirenz is known to affect both phase I and phase II metabolic enzymes, including induction of CYP3A4, 2B6, 2C19, UGT1A1 2B7, and bile efflux transporters and inhibition of CYP3A5, 2C9, 2C19 and UDP 1A4 and 1A9 (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). The effect of efavirenz on CYP3A4 was previously shown to be due to the activation of the human pregnane X receptor, which regulates the CYP3A4 transcription (35).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pharmacokinetics ofpara-Aminosalicylic Acid in HIV-Uninfected and HIV-Coinfected Tuberculosis Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy, Managed for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Kock

Rosenkranz

et al. 2014

dThe emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis prompted the reintroduction of para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) to protect companion anti-tuberculosis drugs from additional acquired resistance. In sub-Saharan Africa, MDR/XDR tuberculosis with HIV coinfection is common, and concurrent treatment of HIV infection and MDR/XDR tuberculosis is required. Out of necessity, patients receive multiple drugs, and PAS therapy is frequent; however, neither potential drug interactions nor the effects of HIV infection are known. Potential drug-drug interaction with PAS and the effect of HIV infection was examined in 73 pulmonary tuberculosis patients; 22 (30.1%) were HIV coinfected. Fortyone pulmonary MDR or XDR tuberculosis patients received 4 g PAS twice daily, and in a second crossover study, another 32 patients were randomized, receiving 4 g PAS twice daily or 8 g PAS once daily. A PAS population pharmacokinetic model in two dosing regimens was developed; potential covariates affecting its pharmacokinetics were examined, and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted evaluating the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic index. The probability of target attainment (PTA) to maintain PAS levels above MIC during the dosing interval was estimated by simulation of once-, twice-, and thrice-daily dosing regimens not exceeding 12 g daily. Concurrent efavirenz (EFV) medication resulted in a 52% increase in PAS clearance and a corresponding >30% reduction in mean PAS area under the concentration curve in 19 of 22 HIV-M. tuberculosis-coinfected patients. Current practice recommends maintenance of PAS concentrations at >1 g/ml (the MIC of M. tuberculosis), but the model predicts that at only a minimum dose of 4 g twice daily can this PTA be achieved in at least 90% of the population, whether or not EFV is concomitantly administered. Once-daily dosing of 12 g PAS will not provide PAS concentrations exceeding the MIC over the entire dosing interval if coadministered with EFV, while 4 g twice daily ensures concentrations exceeding MIC over the entire dosing interval, even in HIV-infected patients who received EFV.

“…With the EFV full-profile model developed, the sparse plasma concentrations were fit together with full-profile plasma data. As strong prior literature suggests that differences in CYP2B6*6 genotypes are linked to variability in exposure measures of EFV (22,34,(36)(37)(38), CYP2B6*6 genotype status was included as a modifier of clearance in the base model. Individuals with CYP2B6*1/*1, CYP2B6*1/*6, and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes were modeled with unique (thetas) for EFV clearance.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population Pharmacokinetic Model Linking Plasma and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Concentrations of Efavirenz and Its Metabolite, 8-Hydroxy-Efavirenz, in HIV Patients

Habtewold

Aklillu

Makonnen

et al. 2017

The objectives of this study were to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of efavirenz (EFV) and 8-hydroxy-efavirenz (8OHEFV) in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and to explore covariates affecting the PK parameters. Fifty-one patients had steady-state 0-to-24-h concentrations of EFV and 8OHEFV in plasma with corresponding concentrations in PBMCs, while 261 patients had one or two sparse concentrations at 16 Ϯ 1 h postdose at weeks 4 and/or 16. The pharmacogenetic markers CYP2B6*6, CYP3A5*3, CYP3A5*6, UGT2B7*2, ABCB1 (3435C¡T, 3842A¡G), OATP1B1*1B, and OATP1B1*5, the presence of a rifampin-based antituberculosis (anti-TB) regimen, baseline body weight and organ function values, and demographic factors were explored as covariates. EFV concentration data were well described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption (K a ) and absorption lag time (A lag ) (K a ϭ 0.2 h Ϫ1 ; A lag ϭ 0.83 h; central compartment clearance [CL c /F] for CYP2B6*1/*1 ϭ 18 liters/h, for CYP2B6*1/*6 ϭ 14 liters/h, and for CYP2B6*6/*6 ϭ 8.6 liters/h) and PBMCs as a peripheral compartment. EFV transfer from plasma to PBMCs was first order (CL p /F ϭ 32 liters/h), followed by capacity-limited return (V max ϭ 4,400 ng/ml/h; K m ϭ 710 ng/ml). Similarly, 8OHEFV displayed a first-order elimination and distribution to PBMCs, with a capacity-limited return to plasma. No covariate relationships resulted in a significant explanation of interindividual variability (IIV) on the estimated PK parameters of EFV and 8OHEFV, except for CYP2B6*6 genotypes, which were consistent with prior evidence. Both EFV and 8OHEFV accumulated to higher concentrations in PBMCs than in plasma and were well described by first-order input and Michaelis-Menten kinetics removal from PBMCs. CYP2B6*6 genotype polymorphisms were associated with decreased EFV and 8OHEFV clearance.KEYWORDS efavirenz, 8-hydroxy-efavirenz, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, population pharmacokinetics E favirenz (EFV)-based antiretroviral therapy remains the preferred first-line treatment option in important international guidelines, including those of the World Health Organization (1). EFV displays a wide between-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability (2, 3). This is ascribed partially to genetic variation of the CYP2B6 enzyme, which is primarily responsible for the metabolism of efavirenz to 8-hydroxy-efavirenz (8OHEFV) (4, 5). Efavirenz is described to have a narrow safety margin (6-8). In addition, a couple