2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01831.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self‐adhesive resin cements

Abstract: Endomethasone interfered negatively with the bond to root dentine; however, AH Plus, Epiphany and Sealer 26 did not interfere in the bond strength of a fibreglass post cemented with self-adhesive resin cements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
57
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning root canal wall modification made by endodontic sealers and canal filling materials, it seems that these materials affect the bond between post and canal walls [15][16]20 . Resinous sealers have the ability to penetrate lateral canals, accessory canals, and dentinal tubules 7 , and their composition and depth of penetration can have specific effects in reducing the post bond strength 16 . These filled dentinal tubules may be obstructed while post spaces are being prepared, which would interfere with the formation of a hybrid layer of resin cement and dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning root canal wall modification made by endodontic sealers and canal filling materials, it seems that these materials affect the bond between post and canal walls [15][16]20 . Resinous sealers have the ability to penetrate lateral canals, accessory canals, and dentinal tubules 7 , and their composition and depth of penetration can have specific effects in reducing the post bond strength 16 . These filled dentinal tubules may be obstructed while post spaces are being prepared, which would interfere with the formation of a hybrid layer of resin cement and dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the crown is clinically almost destroyed, intraradicullar posts are indicated to secure retention between the prosthetic crown and the remaining tooth structure [2][3] .This retention plays an important role in the durability of the final restoration 4 . Recent years have seen increased utilization of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts 5 because of their advantages of desirable esthetics 6 , a modulus of elasticity similar to dentin, stress distribution along a wider surface area on root walls, and minimal risk of vertical root fracture [7][8] . Relating to the limitations in bonding to root canal dentin, numerous studies have been conducted to improve bonding of posts to tooth structures 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their bond strength was lower than that of SBMP. Therefore, it can be stated that the three-step system has better micromechanical entanglement and chemical bonding with the collagen matrix [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21,23 Cecchin et al 20 proposed that the epoxy resin component of resin-based sealers may have increased affinity for various components of the resin cement. However, in contrast to studies by Cecchin et al 20,21 , the calcium hydroxide-based sealer group in the present study was associated with lower bond strength values relative to control and resinbased sealer groups. This result, compatible with 30 is due to the composition of Sealapex, which contains isobutyl salicylate; salicylate is known to react with calcium solubilized by the dissolution of Sealpex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] Some studies indicate that the bond strength of eugenol-based sealer is decreased when used in association with resin cements. 3,20,24 Residual eugenol on the dentin surface could affect the polymerization of resin cements, and the diffusion of eugenol into the dentin tubules could dramatically decrease adhesive efficiency. 29 The lowest bond strength values in the current study were occurred after use of the eugenol sealers, however, no significant difference was observed in bond strength between calcium silicate and eugenol sealer, in contrast to results reported in Özcan et al 24 Calcium silicate-based sealers show an approximate 20% expansion, and removal of these sealers with conventional re-treatment methods is not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%