1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8502(97)85335-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sampling time on the sampling efficiency of all-glass impinger-30 samplers for E-coli aerosol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the entire E. coli suspension was nebulized in each test run, the actual number of bacteria released in the cabinet for each run was known to within an order of magnitude. Concentrations were similar to those of Hu et al (2000) and Ding and Wang (1997) in their studies involving the generation of viable bacterial aerosols. It should be appreciated that while viable cells and spores are known to be prone to damage via the nebulization process, the method discussed here is also based on the recovery of a cell fragment (i.e., the tutE or tutH genes) and its subsequent amplification via PCR.…”
Section: Release Aerosolsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Because the entire E. coli suspension was nebulized in each test run, the actual number of bacteria released in the cabinet for each run was known to within an order of magnitude. Concentrations were similar to those of Hu et al (2000) and Ding and Wang (1997) in their studies involving the generation of viable bacterial aerosols. It should be appreciated that while viable cells and spores are known to be prone to damage via the nebulization process, the method discussed here is also based on the recovery of a cell fragment (i.e., the tutE or tutH genes) and its subsequent amplification via PCR.…”
Section: Release Aerosolsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…3 and 4). A significantly decreased recovery of culturable E. coli was also reported when sampling with the AGI-30 for 5 min (Ding & Wang, 1997). Increasing the sampling duration may allow more already collected cells to be reaerosolized from the liquid (Willeke et al, 1998).…”
Section: Sampling Durationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The samplers with similar collection principle (e.g., AGI-30 and BioSampler with liquid fluid, Andersen 1-STG and MAS-100 with agar plate) have not been simultaneously assessed for their ability to retaining airborne L. pneumophila. Besides, the effect of sampling time on the recovery of airborne L. pneumophila remains unknown although its influence has been explored on other airborne microorganisms (Ding & Wang, 1997;Mainelis & Tabayoyong, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampler is an all-glass, swirling aerosol collector consisting of an air inlet, three tangentially arranged nozzles and a collection vessel [35]. The AGI-30 sampler (Ace Glass Inc., N.J., USA) is a cheap, but less efficient impinger developed to sample bioaerosols [36,37].…”
Section: Collection Of Air Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%