“…Although criticism of some of the above classification systems has been expressed, each relies on the identification of specific sperm abnormalities and each presents a detailed list of observable anomalies, most of which have been thoroughly described by light microscopy supported by numerous ultrastructural studies. In contrast, the morphological classification of avian sperm abnormalities lacks uniformity and although the presence of abnormal sperm has been reported in a variety of bird species [17,21,26,27,28,35,41,57], the anomalies are described in broad and variable terms which makes it difficult to draw meaningful comparisons. The lack of detailed descriptions of avian sperm abnormalities is compounded, with few exceptions [19,22,29,30,31], by a dearth of supportive ultrastructural data.…”