2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12298-021-01032-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of shading and high temperature amplitude in greenhouse on growth, photosynthesis, yield and phenolic contents of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the reduction in the fruit number induced by shading did not affect the weight of the fruit (Table 3). Total, marketable, and unmarketable fruits weight (kg pl −1 ) did not show significant differences in shaded plants compared to the control, in contrast to the findings of Angmo et al [42], who reported an increase in total marketable fruit weight in the open field compared to shaded conditions, which could be attributed to different environmental conditions, genetic material, and cultural practices [43][44][45]. In the present experiment, we adopted a processing tomato cultivar that was neither tied nor defoliated, in contrast to the methods used by the authors mentioned above, and in part, could have determined different production responses.…”
Section: Yield and Yield Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the reduction in the fruit number induced by shading did not affect the weight of the fruit (Table 3). Total, marketable, and unmarketable fruits weight (kg pl −1 ) did not show significant differences in shaded plants compared to the control, in contrast to the findings of Angmo et al [42], who reported an increase in total marketable fruit weight in the open field compared to shaded conditions, which could be attributed to different environmental conditions, genetic material, and cultural practices [43][44][45]. In the present experiment, we adopted a processing tomato cultivar that was neither tied nor defoliated, in contrast to the methods used by the authors mentioned above, and in part, could have determined different production responses.…”
Section: Yield and Yield Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…From a physiological point of view, the increase in fruit size depends on the enlargement of the pericarp due to the production of new cells during the anthesis process and the growth and expansion of cells that last until the fruit ripening [2]. According to Angmo et al [42], compared to the control, we observed an average increase in the equatorial and polar diameter of fruits of 8.60 and 10.50%, respectively, when grown under shading nets (Table 4). The larger fruit size recorded under shading nets accounted for the higher average marketable fruit weight (Table 3), attributed to the higher water content in the fruit (lower dry matter) that resulted in a dilution effect on TSS (Table 4).…”
Section: Quality Attributes Of Fruitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are similar to previous study on plant where an extensive range of related phenolic compounds and avonoids were found to be produced against the stressful conditions (Rozema et al, 1997). In general, higher UV-B radiation activates phenolic and avonoids synthesis (Angmo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from reducing the temperature, shading has been observed to present other important bene ts for the crop. These bene ts are related to the increase in the quality and quantity of production, the decrease of disease and pest activity, the better management of natural resources such as water, due to the lower evaporation under the shade, while at the same time, the reduced evaporation leads to the better assimilation of CO 2 , due to the increased stomatal resistance (Angmo et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%