2013
DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2013.799573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of shoe orientation on shoe-surface traction in tennis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ura et al [8] reported higher contact areas as the vertical load increases. During sliding, the asperities of the surface deform the shoe sole and the energy dissipation and therefore temperature increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ura et al [8] reported higher contact areas as the vertical load increases. During sliding, the asperities of the surface deform the shoe sole and the energy dissipation and therefore temperature increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These mechanisms are affected by other parameters (e.g. roughness, contact area, normal load, shoe orientation), which have been previously studied and showed significant effects on friction [3,7,8]. It is possible that temperature changes due to friction during sliding contacts could change shoe sole material properties, with further implications for the tribological mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En relación a los giros de pivote, se ha observado que la mayoría de los giros se realizan teniendo como punto de apoyo el antepié, pero en algunos casos los jugadores utilizan el retropié como pivote de rotación. El dibujo de la suela del calzado tiene una gran efecto sobre la tracción (18) , y por lo tanto debe permitir este tipo de movimientos para evitar posibles lesiones de miembro inferior.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The magnitude of these forces in combination with other variables, e.g. surface roughness (Clarke et al 2012) and shoe orientation (Ura et al, 2013) affects the friction generated between the shoe and surface. Previous tennis studies have reported peak vertical forces of 1243.9 ± 99.1 and 1680.5 ± 483.7 N on hard court for a side jump and running forehand movements respectively (Damm et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%