2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of soil–infilled joints on the stability of rock wedges formed in a tunnel roof

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the boundary normal stiffness imposed by the surrounding rock mass, other parameters can affect the shear behaviour of rock interfaces such as the interface's surface roughness, the level of initial applied normal stress or the presence of infill (gouge) material with water in the joint interface. Even though a considerable amount of work has been conducted to describe how these factors affect the shear behaviour of joints under more conventional conditions (shearing under constant normal load -CNL: Ladanyi and Archambault, 1969 [5], Barton and Choubey, 1977 [6], Hutson and Dowding, 1990 [7], Indraratna and Buddhima, 2010 [8], Tatone and Grasselli, 2015 [9]), only a few studies with limited experimental data and analysis on the shear response of interfaces under CNS conditions exist (Seidel and Collingwood, 2001 [10], Indraratna et al [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the boundary normal stiffness imposed by the surrounding rock mass, other parameters can affect the shear behaviour of rock interfaces such as the interface's surface roughness, the level of initial applied normal stress or the presence of infill (gouge) material with water in the joint interface. Even though a considerable amount of work has been conducted to describe how these factors affect the shear behaviour of joints under more conventional conditions (shearing under constant normal load -CNL: Ladanyi and Archambault, 1969 [5], Barton and Choubey, 1977 [6], Hutson and Dowding, 1990 [7], Indraratna and Buddhima, 2010 [8], Tatone and Grasselli, 2015 [9]), only a few studies with limited experimental data and analysis on the shear response of interfaces under CNS conditions exist (Seidel and Collingwood, 2001 [10], Indraratna et al [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese soft fillings significantly weaken the shear strength of jointed rock and make the rock present more obvious heterogeneity and anisotropy. Infilled joints generally become the weakest position under shear which will easily trigger the whole instability of engineering rock [1][2][3][4]. erefore, the study of shear properties of infilled joints is of significance in both stability evaluation and reinforcement of engineering rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indraratna et al [5] put forward a joint material mode characterizing the mechanical characteristics of the discontinuous rock masses instead of equivalent continuum-based method considered to be unsuitable, and soil-infilled joint model was then employed to investigate the rock wedge in the crown of cavities. Afterwards, with the prevalence of Hoek-Brown criterion, Fraldi and Guarracino [6][7][8] proposed a curved failure mechanism on the roof of deep tunnels and derived upper bound solutions of collapsing region in the realm of plasticity theory together with variational principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%