2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of soil particle size on soil-subsoiler interactions using the discrete element method simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resistance on the suppression device mainly comes from the suppression of the big ridges and small ridge furrows [7,22] . Figure 8 shows the variation curves of the horizontal traction resistance on the suppression device, and the component force of the resistance on the device in the forward direction was traction resistance.…”
Section: Horizontal Traction Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistance on the suppression device mainly comes from the suppression of the big ridges and small ridge furrows [7,22] . Figure 8 shows the variation curves of the horizontal traction resistance on the suppression device, and the component force of the resistance on the device in the forward direction was traction resistance.…”
Section: Horizontal Traction Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outlier samples were excluded from the analysis, resulting in only 116 soil sample measurements for data analysis and discussion. Using the soil-particle size classification guideline proposed by Wang et al [23] and Ma et al [24], we classified soil particles into clay (<4 µm), silt (4-63 µm), and sand (>63 µm) and further classified silt particles into fine silt (4-16 µm) and coarse silt (16-63 µm). Other character parameters of the soil samples (medium particle diameter, Md; standard deviation, σ I ; skewness, Sk; and kurtosis, Kg) were calculated and diagramed using Folk and Wood's formulas [18].…”
Section: Sampling and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software Solidworks was used to create the geometric simulation model of the ridge forming device and import it into the EDEM software. The numerical simulation process of mechanized ridge forming is shown in Figure 6, the simulation time step is 1.23×10 −5 s, and the total simulation time is 2.40 s [18,19] .…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Mechanized Ridge Forming Processmentioning
confidence: 99%