2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.184419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of spin transfer torque on domain wall motion regimes in [Co/Ni] superlattice wires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By fitting the DW depinning at 50% on entire of the map, with revisited Arrhenius law by taking into account the impact of STT, Oersted field and Joule heating on the energy barrier, we have (i) estimated the position of the pinning site from the border of the wire and (ii) extracted specific parameters attributed to STT effect both adiabatic and nonadiabatic term [25][26][27]. The values of both terms are close to those obtained previously for a single [Co/Ni] layer [18] which validates the experimental method.…”
Section: We Investigated the Current-induced Domain Wall (Dw) Depinnisupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By fitting the DW depinning at 50% on entire of the map, with revisited Arrhenius law by taking into account the impact of STT, Oersted field and Joule heating on the energy barrier, we have (i) estimated the position of the pinning site from the border of the wire and (ii) extracted specific parameters attributed to STT effect both adiabatic and nonadiabatic term [25][26][27]. The values of both terms are close to those obtained previously for a single [Co/Ni] layer [18] which validates the experimental method.…”
Section: We Investigated the Current-induced Domain Wall (Dw) Depinnisupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(ii) No new DW nucleation ever occurred on the left part of the wire by Kerr microscopy during the experiment. (iii) We have checked that the maximum current density 40×10 10 A/m² is too low in our system to observe the counterintuitive STT-driven DW depinning against a high H app as already seen for Co/Ni [18,34] and for having a DW depinning at µ 0 H app =0 mT. Note that we previously estimated the current density threshold where this counterintuitive STT-driven occurs for DW motion to be about 30×10 10 A/m² in epitaxial Co/Ni wires [18].…”
Section: We Investigated the Current-induced Domain Wall (Dw) Depinnimentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations