1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(98)00080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of strategic supplementary feeding on ewe productivity under range conditions in North Kordofan, Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flushing significantly affected litter weight at birth and weaning (Sormunen-Cristian and Jauhiainen, 2002). This finding is in agreement with El-Hag et al (1998) who reported higher birth weights in ewes supplemented with flushing ration during breeding time as compared to ewes which were not supplemented. Average weaning weights of lambs at three months of age was found as 16.89 kg.…”
Section: Productive Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Flushing significantly affected litter weight at birth and weaning (Sormunen-Cristian and Jauhiainen, 2002). This finding is in agreement with El-Hag et al (1998) who reported higher birth weights in ewes supplemented with flushing ration during breeding time as compared to ewes which were not supplemented. Average weaning weights of lambs at three months of age was found as 16.89 kg.…”
Section: Productive Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results agree well with those reported by Ribeiro et al (2002) for ewes supplemented with 0.5 kg per animal of ground corn. Similar benefits on litter size and lambing rates after flushing were described by El-Hag et al (1998). In line with these results Marzouk et al (2018) reported that enhancing ration during breeding period is enough to improve the reproductive performance of Ossimi ewes.…”
Section: Reproductive Responsessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the groups of 107 ewes, fl ushing, steaming-up, and fl ushing plus steaming-up, increased monetary returns by US$96, US$627 and US$1058, respectively, compared with the normal farmer practice (Table 4). The added returns relative to added costs were 99%, 118% and 131%, respectively, compared with the 120% and 152% reported by Reese et al (1990) and El-Hag et al (1998), respectively. Partial budget analysis of post-weaning supplementary feeding of ewe lambs (Table 5) showed that the improved practice could increase returns for 50 animals by US$208 over the farmer practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…During this period, the reproductive performance of flocks may be very low in Mediterranean regions because rangelands have dried off potentially limiting both nutrient intake and digestibility of rangeland by ewes (Molle et al, 1997). Under these conditions, protein or energy-based supplementary feeding often referred to as "flushing", around the time of mating improves reproductive performance (Downing et al, 1995;Molle et al, 1995;El-Hag et al, 1998). The role of nutritional flushing should not be ignored, especially where oestrus is included and multiple births are the result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%