2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp509731y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sulfate Electrolyte Additives on LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2/Graphite Pouch Cell Lifetime: Correlation between XPS Surface Studies and Electrochemical Test Results

Abstract: The role of two homologous cyclic sulfate electrolyte additives, trimethylene sulfate (or 1,3,2-dioxathiane-2,2-dioxide, TMS) and ethylene sulfate (or 1,3,2-dioxathiolane-2,2-dioxide, DTD), used either alone or in combination with vinylene carbonate (VC) on the lifetime of LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 (NMC)/graphite pouch cells was studied by correlating data from gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC−MS), dQ/dV analysis, ultrahigh precision coulometry, storage experiments, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

12
155
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
12
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…37,38 When VC and PES were used either alone or in combination, the EC peak at 2.75 V was almost suppressed which means that both VC and PES nearly eliminate the reduction of EC at this voltage. 33 For VC, however, a peak/plateau appeared at ∼2.65 V (graphite at ∼0.9 V vs. Li/Li + ) due to the preferential reduction of VC, in agreement with the consumption of about 9% of the initially added VC at 2.4 V and 55% at 3.5 V measured by GC-MS (Figure 2c). 20,33,39 In the case of PES, a peak/plateau was observed at a lower voltage of 2.4 V (graphite at ∼1.1 V vs. Li/Li + ) and is assigned to lower reduction potential of PES at the graphite surface compared to VC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…37,38 When VC and PES were used either alone or in combination, the EC peak at 2.75 V was almost suppressed which means that both VC and PES nearly eliminate the reduction of EC at this voltage. 33 For VC, however, a peak/plateau appeared at ∼2.65 V (graphite at ∼0.9 V vs. Li/Li + ) due to the preferential reduction of VC, in agreement with the consumption of about 9% of the initially added VC at 2.4 V and 55% at 3.5 V measured by GC-MS (Figure 2c). 20,33,39 In the case of PES, a peak/plateau was observed at a lower voltage of 2.4 V (graphite at ∼1.1 V vs. Li/Li + ) and is assigned to lower reduction potential of PES at the graphite surface compared to VC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the peak spacing and widths were not a good match with the typical values obtained with this instrument. 47 It was then considered whether the two peaks may correspond to the reduced bipyridine adduct species, where the low BE peak corresponds to the aromatic carbon (C=C) and the higher BE peak corresponds to the carbon atoms directly bonded to nitrogen (C-N). The C-N peak is approximately expected to be at the same position as C-O.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample holder was then transferred into the XPS system, without exposure to air, using a vacuum suitcase. 12 Electrodes were left under ultra-high vacuum overnight to allow for off-gassing of any remaining volatile components. The samples were then transferred to the analysis chamber of the XPS, which had a base pressure <2 × 10 −10 mbar, which was always at a pressure >2 × 10 −9 mbar during analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%