2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sulfonamides and Their Structurally Related Derivatives on the Activity of ι-Carbonic Anhydrase from Burkholderia territorii

Abstract: Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are essential metalloenzymes in nature, catalyzing the carbon dioxide reversible hydration into bicarbonate and proton. In humans, breathing and many other critical physiological processes depend on this enzymatic activity. The CA superfamily function and inhibition in pathogenic bacteria has recently been the object of significant advances, being demonstrated to affect microbial survival/virulence. Targeting bacterial CAs may thus be a valid alternative to expand the pharmacological … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibitor and enzyme solutions were preincubated together for 15 min at room temperature prior to the assay, in order to allow for the formation of the E-I complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using Prism 3 and the Cheng-Prusoff equation, as reported earlier 13 , 14 , and represent the mean from at least three different determinations. The NgCA concentration in the assay system was 6.3 nM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitor and enzyme solutions were preincubated together for 15 min at room temperature prior to the assay, in order to allow for the formation of the E-I complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using Prism 3 and the Cheng-Prusoff equation, as reported earlier 13 , 14 , and represent the mean from at least three different determinations. The NgCA concentration in the assay system was 6.3 nM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, by adding Mn 2+ , the enzyme activity was not present or the enzyme was found to contain zinc, probably from the traces of this ion present as impurity in the used reagents 60 . The protein resulted sensitive to inhibition with substituted benzene-sulphonamides and clinically licenced sulfonamide-, sulfamate- and sulfamide-type drugs, which are among the most investigated CA inhibitors (CAIs) 61 . BteCAι inhibition profile showed several benzene-sulphonamides with an inhibition constant lower than 100 nM 61 .…”
Section: The Ultimately Discovered Class the ι-Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein resulted sensitive to inhibition with substituted benzene-sulphonamides and clinically licenced sulfonamide-, sulfamate- and sulfamide-type drugs, which are among the most investigated CA inhibitors (CAIs) 61 . BteCAι inhibition profile showed several benzene-sulphonamides with an inhibition constant lower than 100 nM 61 . In addition to sulphonamides and their bioisosteres, anion and small molecules (another group of CAIs) were investigated as BteCAι inhibitors 62 .…”
Section: The Ultimately Discovered Class the ι-Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1.) are metalloenzymes catalyzing the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide to bicarbonate anion and proton, thereby affecting related physiological processes [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Inhibition of bacterial CAs leads to the inhibition of growth, growth defects, and makes bacteria vulnerable to host defense mechanisms [ 4 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibition of bacterial CAs leads to the inhibition of growth, growth defects, and makes bacteria vulnerable to host defense mechanisms [ 4 , 8 , 9 ]. Over the last few years, a number of articles describing the inhibition activity of clinically licensed or new sulfonamides against bacterial CAs presented in Vibrio cholerae [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], Burkholderia pseudomallei [ 19 ], Burkholderia territorii [ 7 , 20 ], Escherichia coli [ 21 , 22 ], and others, were published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%