1999
DOI: 10.1097/00006676-199907000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sumatriptan on External Pancreatic Secretion and Its Interaction with Endogenous Norepinephrine in the Rat

Abstract: We reported previously that blocking norepinephrine reuptake by nisoxetine could modulate external pancreatic secretion in the rat. We report in this study the interaction of serotonin (5-HT) with endogenous catecholamines by using sumatriptan, an agonist of 5-HT1 receptors, in combination with nisoxetine. Urethane-anesthetized male Wistar rats were fitted with an acute pancreatic fistula. Nisoxetine (0.3 mgkg, i.v.) and sumatriptan (0.1-1 mgkg, s.c.) were administered alone or in combination. Pancreatic secre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, spiperone hydrochloride-induced pancreatic exocrine secretion was partially inhibited by atropine in this study. These results agree with previous reports that 5-HT1 receptor agonist produced a dose-related inhibition of pancreatic exocrine secretion through a modulation of the vagal cholinergic pathway [15]. On the other hand, it is reported that 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists inhibited pancreatic exocrine secretion [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, spiperone hydrochloride-induced pancreatic exocrine secretion was partially inhibited by atropine in this study. These results agree with previous reports that 5-HT1 receptor agonist produced a dose-related inhibition of pancreatic exocrine secretion through a modulation of the vagal cholinergic pathway [15]. On the other hand, it is reported that 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists inhibited pancreatic exocrine secretion [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%