No abstract

No abstract

Alcohol intake is a major problem in drug addicts, and it is not clear whether the effects of alcohol and opiates are additive or potentiating. Vagally stimulated pancreatic secretion in rats is potently inhibited by opiates acting centrally at mu-receptors. In the present experiments, we determined the effects of methadone on 2-deoxyglucose (2DG)-stimulated pancreatic secretion in rats treated with acute (1.9 g/kg.3 h, intravenously) or chronic (1 or 3 month drinking) ethanol. In both acute and 1 month chronic alcoholic rats, methadone administered at its 50% inhibitory dose (ID50) reduced by about 50% 2DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion of sodium, bicarbonate and protein, and ethanol had only faint, nonsignificant inhibitory effects. In 3 month chronic alcoholic rats, similar results were obtained, but methadone inhibited 2DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion by 60 to 90% in these older rats. No significant interaction was found in any condition between ethanol and methadone, suggesting that they had only additive, but not potentiating effects in this method.

We reported previously that blocking norepinephrine reuptake by nisoxetine could modulate external pancreatic secretion in the rat. We report in this study the interaction of serotonin (5-HT) with endogenous catecholamines by using sumatriptan, an agonist of 5-HT1 receptors, in combination with nisoxetine. Urethane-anesthetized male Wistar rats were fitted with an acute pancreatic fistula. Nisoxetine (0.3 mgkg, i.v.) and sumatriptan (0.1-1 mgkg, s.c.) were administered alone or in combination. Pancreatic secretion was measured under stimulation by 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG; 75 mgkg, i.v.), by vagal electrical stimulation (4 V, 2 ms, 10 Hz), or by acetylcholine (661,800 pg/kg.h). (i) 2DG: Nisoxetine alone inhibited 2DG-induced pancreatic secretion (p < 0.01 ). Sumatriptan alone also produced a dose-related inhibition of 2DGinduced pancreatic secretion (p < 0.01). When sumatriptan and nisoxetine were combined, protein response to 2DG remained inhibited, whereas water and electrolyte secretion was restored.(ii) Vagal stimulation: Nisoxetine did not modify water and electrolyte output in response to vagal electrical stimulation (VES), whereas it inhibited protein response by 75%. Sumatriptan alone strongly inhibited pancreatic response to VES (p < 0.01). When nisoxetine and sumatriptan were combined, the protein response to VES remained inhibited, whereas water and electrolyte response to VES was restored. (iii) Acetylcholine: Nisoxetine and sumatriptan alone or combined did not modify pancreatic response to acetylcholine. These results indicate that noradrenergic and serotonergic agents can indirectly affect pancreatic secretion through a modulation of the vagal cholinergic pathway. Nisoxetine and sumatriptan interact negatively on hydroelectrolytic pancreatic secretion, whereas they inhibit the secretion of enzymes both alone and in combination.