1993
DOI: 10.1002/apj.5500010103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Superficial Gas Velocity on Bubble Size, Terminal Bubble Rise Velocity and Gas Hold‐up in Bubble Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as a small amount of surfactant is added to the water), further reductions in surface tension (higher alcohol concentrations) have a much smaller impact on k L a except for the case in which there is no rotation of the inner cylinder and for low gas flow rates. Previous studies in other flow geometries have also suggested that there is a limiting concentration when using ethanol to increase the mass transfer coefficient, above which the change in k L a becomes less pronounced [67]. Indeed, such an interpretation is consistent with the observation that neither the bubble diameter nor the values of k L a change significantly for the higher alcohol concentrations (lower surface tensions) considered.…”
Section: Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…as a small amount of surfactant is added to the water), further reductions in surface tension (higher alcohol concentrations) have a much smaller impact on k L a except for the case in which there is no rotation of the inner cylinder and for low gas flow rates. Previous studies in other flow geometries have also suggested that there is a limiting concentration when using ethanol to increase the mass transfer coefficient, above which the change in k L a becomes less pronounced [67]. Indeed, such an interpretation is consistent with the observation that neither the bubble diameter nor the values of k L a change significantly for the higher alcohol concentrations (lower surface tensions) considered.…”
Section: Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The mean of the bubble Sauter diameters varies between approximately 2.0-4.5 mm for most cases with standard deviations of 0.12-1.31 mm. Comparison of the mean bubble size for the non-rotating case with data obtained using a conventional bubble column [67] is shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Bubble Size and Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, it is often used to determine the flow regimes [14,16,25]. Two methods can be used to estimate the global gas holdup: height difference measurement [36] and differential pressure measurement [37][38][39][40]. With the height difference method, the global gas holdup is determined from the height of the unaerated liquid and the total height under aeration.…”
Section: Gas Holdupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous experimental investigations have concluded that the gas holdup in bubble columns is strongly dependent on the column geometry (i.e. length and diameter) 2–6. On the basis of the column geometry, the following three regions have been identified by many researchers:7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%