2003
DOI: 10.1080/01457630304069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Surface Roughness on Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Characteristics at Low Reynolds Numbers in Small Diameter Tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
141
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
141
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Entrylength effects must therefore be considered in evaluating both heat transfer coefficients and pressure drop. Kandlikar et al [32] have recently shown the standard entry length correlations for the thermally developing region of a hydrodynamically fully developed flow to be within experimental error in tubes of 0.6 and 1 mm diameter.…”
Section: Single-phase Heat Transfer Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Entrylength effects must therefore be considered in evaluating both heat transfer coefficients and pressure drop. Kandlikar et al [32] have recently shown the standard entry length correlations for the thermally developing region of a hydrodynamically fully developed flow to be within experimental error in tubes of 0.6 and 1 mm diameter.…”
Section: Single-phase Heat Transfer Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kandlikar et al [32] have shown that wall roughness can significantly affect heat transfer, pressure drop, and transition Reynolds number in small tubes. Study in this area is continuing, but it is to be noted that a level of roughness that is negligible in a large tube may be significant in a tiny tube.…”
Section: Single-phase Heat Transfer Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the upper limit of the considered Reynolds number interval, the flow through labyrinth-type channels could start exhibit a transitional behaviour (Pfahler et al, 1990;Harley et al, 1995;Kandilikar et al, 2003). As discussed above, some of the previous CFD studies on this matter are based on fully turbulent modelling assumptions, which is arguably an oversimplification of the actual flow physics.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2), in the multi-component formulation, is rewritten in the following form (Pfahler et al, 1990;Harley et al, 1995;Qisu and Xiaoyi, 1997;Kandilikar et al, 2003;Biscarini et al, 2013;Falcucci et al, 2016;Montessori et al, 2016): (8) in which , u → is the mean value of the macroscopic velocity, provided by: According to Eq. (7), it is possible to set different values for the species viscosities, in order to evaluate the behaviour of the passively advected species for different values of Peclét nondimensional number, defined as: (10) in which L is a characteristic dimension and U is the species macroscopic velocity magnitude.…”
Section: Multi-component Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%