2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surfactant, HCl and NH3 treatments on the regeneration of waste activated carbon used in selective catalytic reduction unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Activated carbon is used widely for the adsorption of noxious gases and heavy metals, as well as for wastewater treatment because of its large adsorption capacity, large surface area, and high porosity [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. On the other hand, the price of commercial activated carbon produced from bituminous coal, coconut shell, wood, or peat is relatively high because of the costly raw materials and expensive activation process [26].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Activated carbon is used widely for the adsorption of noxious gases and heavy metals, as well as for wastewater treatment because of its large adsorption capacity, large surface area, and high porosity [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. On the other hand, the price of commercial activated carbon produced from bituminous coal, coconut shell, wood, or peat is relatively high because of the costly raw materials and expensive activation process [26].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it has an important drawback: its specific surface area, and therefore its adsorption capacity, is smaller than that of activated carbon. Various activation treatment methods have been proposed to enhance the adsorption capacity of biochar [16,46].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used adsorbent is activated carbon [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Among the alternative adsorbents that can replace activated carbon, biochar, a by-product of biomass pyrolysis, has recently received extensive attention because of its low cost [14,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Cu 2+ Removal Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the severe NO x emission situation and the rigorous emission legislation exhibit, many efforts have been made in NO x reduction [8]. SCR (selective catalytic reduction) of NO x with NH 3 [9][10][11][12] has been extensively proved to be the most efficient way for the removal of NO x from stationary sources. A catalyst is critical to create an efficient SCR reaction and operating cost [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%