1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1997.00080.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sward surface height on intake and grazing behaviour by lactating Holstein Friesian cows

Abstract: Minson, 1990). Nevertheless, grazed pasture is an economically attractive major food resource

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
37
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
12
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavioural adaption is consistent with reports in the literature; low pre-grazing HM or sward height leads to a reduction in intake per bite causing cows to adapt their grazing behaviour in an effort to maintain GDMI (Hodgson, 1985). Such responses have been reported under both continuous grazing (Gibb et al, 1997) and strip grazing systems (Peŕez-Prieto and Delagarde, 2012;Tuñon 2013) where cows increased grazing time in order to totally or partially compensate for a reduced intake rate on low HM pastures. However, the compensatory response of increasing grazing time may be limited by the time budgets for ruminating and other activities (Gibb et al, 1997) and thus daily GDMI may be limited by grazing short pastures.…”
Section: Milk Productionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This behavioural adaption is consistent with reports in the literature; low pre-grazing HM or sward height leads to a reduction in intake per bite causing cows to adapt their grazing behaviour in an effort to maintain GDMI (Hodgson, 1985). Such responses have been reported under both continuous grazing (Gibb et al, 1997) and strip grazing systems (Peŕez-Prieto and Delagarde, 2012;Tuñon 2013) where cows increased grazing time in order to totally or partially compensate for a reduced intake rate on low HM pastures. However, the compensatory response of increasing grazing time may be limited by the time budgets for ruminating and other activities (Gibb et al, 1997) and thus daily GDMI may be limited by grazing short pastures.…”
Section: Milk Productionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Such responses have been reported under both continuous grazing (Gibb et al, 1997) and strip grazing systems (Peŕez-Prieto and Delagarde, 2012;Tuñon 2013) where cows increased grazing time in order to totally or partially compensate for a reduced intake rate on low HM pastures. However, the compensatory response of increasing grazing time may be limited by the time budgets for ruminating and other activities (Gibb et al, 1997) and thus daily GDMI may be limited by grazing short pastures. The lack of treatment effect on GDMI in the current study demonstrates the ability of rotationally grazed cows to adapt their grazing behaviour to maintain GDMI across the range of HM investigated.…”
Section: Milk Productionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Herbage height tended (P , 0.10) to be higher in summer. In agreement with Gibb et al (1997) and Burns and Sollenberger (2002), this variable was negatively correlated with bite rate (r 5 20.60; P , 0.001) and positively related to bite mass (r 5 0.55; P , 0.01). In particular, in a Boval et al's (2007) experiment, bite mass increased by 9 mg per additional centimetre of extended tiller length.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Studies conducted in conventional pasture-based systems have analyzed the impact of supplementation (Phillips and Leaver, 1986;Sheahan et al, 2011), frequency of pasture allocation (Dalley et al, 2001;Granzin, 2003), pasture height (Gibb et al, 1997) and pasture allowance (Chilibroste et al, 2012), together with available grazing time (Gregorini et al, 2009;Kennedy et al, 2009;Perez-Ramirez et al, 2009), prior fasting (Chilibroste et al, 1997 and2007) and time of the day (Gregorini, 2012) on cow behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%