1991
DOI: 10.3233/ves-1991-1202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Telescopic Spectacles on Head Stability in Normal and Low Vision

Abstract: Telescopic spectacles, highly magnifying visual aids mounted in spectacle frames, markedly alter the visual consequences of head movements. To evaluate the effect of this altered visual feedback on head stability, angular head velocity of normally sighted and low vision subjects was measured in the roll, pitch, and yaw axes. Measurements were made under two postural conditions: (1) quiet standing; and (2) walking in place, as well as three visual conditions: (1) eyes closed; (2) unmagnified vision; and (3) vis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When subjected to Fourier analysis, these movements during standing typically have peak components up to 5 Hz and significant components up to 10 Hz. Much larger head velocities are encountered in all three axes during gentle walking in place, 2 but maximum head velocities during running are up to 90 degrees/second, with predominant frequencies up to 2.7 Hz for yaw and 8.2 Hz for pitch 3 , 4 . The frequency of involuntary head movements in pitch tends to be substantially higher and often at a higher velocity than head movements in the other two rotational axes.…”
Section: Fundamental Physiologymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When subjected to Fourier analysis, these movements during standing typically have peak components up to 5 Hz and significant components up to 10 Hz. Much larger head velocities are encountered in all three axes during gentle walking in place, 2 but maximum head velocities during running are up to 90 degrees/second, with predominant frequencies up to 2.7 Hz for yaw and 8.2 Hz for pitch 3 , 4 . The frequency of involuntary head movements in pitch tends to be substantially higher and often at a higher velocity than head movements in the other two rotational axes.…”
Section: Fundamental Physiologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Natural head movements are ubiquitous consequences of transmitted heartbeat, tremor, ambulation, vehicular travel, and (in California) seismic activity 1 . Even when attempting to stand completely at rest, people exhibit significant involuntary head movements about the vertical axis (yaw), about the interaural axis (pitch), and about the anteroposterior axis (roll) 2 . When subjected to Fourier analysis, these movements during standing typically have peak components up to 5 Hz and significant components up to 10 Hz.…”
Section: Fundamental Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials with visible targets in the light (VVOR) were interleaved with VOR trials with instructions to the subjects to visualize in darkness the remembered targets at the distances previously viewed. Two motion profiles were used: sinusoids at a constant peak velocity of 30 degrees/second and frequencies ranging between 0.8 and 2.0 Hz, and unpredictable, pseudorandom step changes in head position having typical head accelerations in pitch of 900 to 1100 degrees/second2 (146 N‐M = 108 ft‐lb rotator), and in yaw of 200 to 300 degrees/second2 (27 N‐M rotator).…”
Section: Angular Vor During Natural Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angular head movements occur constantly in daily life because of transmitted heartbeat, tremor, sway, ambulation, and vehicular travel 1. Even when a person is attempting to stand completely at rest, involuntary angular head movements occur about the vertical axis (yaw), the interaural axis (pitch), and the anteroposterior axis (roll) 2. Such head movements during quiet standing have root‐mean‐square (RMS) velocities of around 1 degree/second and commonly occur at frequencies above 1.0 Hz, where smooth visual‐tracking mechanisms have significant performance limitations 3,4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation