1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1997.5201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Temperature on the Mixed Micellar Tetradecyltrimethylammonium Bromide–Butanol System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate whether the negative charge of SDS was essential for this interaction, similar experiments were carried out in the presence of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (TTAB), a cationic counterpart of SDS with very similar physicochemical properties. The spectra obtained in TTAB (concentrations ranging from 1 M to 10 mM, with a CMC of 3.6 mM [2]) are not significantly different from those obtained in aqueous solution and typically account for a random coil conformation (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In order to investigate whether the negative charge of SDS was essential for this interaction, similar experiments were carried out in the presence of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (TTAB), a cationic counterpart of SDS with very similar physicochemical properties. The spectra obtained in TTAB (concentrations ranging from 1 M to 10 mM, with a CMC of 3.6 mM [2]) are not significantly different from those obtained in aqueous solution and typically account for a random coil conformation (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…• C. This observation is related to the lowering effect of this kind of additive on the CMC (4,(13)(14)(15).The micellar solution with no additive was studied at 30…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The degree of ionization in the micelle (α) and the degree of counter ion binding, β = (1 − α) of both (SDS) and (SLES) as a function of mole fraction of alcohol at different temperatures were calculated as in the following equation [5]:…”
Section: Concentration Dependence Of Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of the CMC with chemical and physical parameters provides good insights into the nature of the surfactant self-association. The physical methods for CMC determination includes conductivity, solubility, viscosity, light scattering, measuring the surface tension by Wiebelmy slide method or by the method of maximum bubble pressure, measurement of ion activity and by dye incorporation method, Gel filtration spectrophtometrically and counter ion magnetic resonance [2][3][4][5][6]. Some authors had been used the conductivity measurements to study the micellization of; SDS surfactant in water and in propanol-water mixed solvent [7][8][9][10][11][12], other surfactant [13,14] and ionic liquids [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%