2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the dielectric–substrate interface on charge accumulation from vacuum ultraviolet irradiation of low-k porous organosilicate dielectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this section is to indicate what differences in VUV response are observed for industrially relevant SiCN/SiCOH/SiCN/Cu stacks exposed to plasma etch, as compared to samples on Si with or without native oxide. 364,367,368 Here, dielectric films deposited on Cu and, for comparison, model Si/SiO2 films, were irradiated with VUV photons having energies and fluxes typically generated during plasma processing. It was found that the nature of the dielectric-substrate interface changes the number of trapped charges in the dielectric.…”
Section: Iv5 Effect Of Dielectric-substrate Interface On Charge Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this section is to indicate what differences in VUV response are observed for industrially relevant SiCN/SiCOH/SiCN/Cu stacks exposed to plasma etch, as compared to samples on Si with or without native oxide. 364,367,368 Here, dielectric films deposited on Cu and, for comparison, model Si/SiO2 films, were irradiated with VUV photons having energies and fluxes typically generated during plasma processing. It was found that the nature of the dielectric-substrate interface changes the number of trapped charges in the dielectric.…”
Section: Iv5 Effect Of Dielectric-substrate Interface On Charge Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose here is to determine what differences in VUV response are observed for industrially relevant SiCN/SiCOH/SiCN/Cu stacks exposed to plasma etch, as compared to samples on Si with or without native oxide, similar to those described in other sections. [83][84][85] Here, dielectric films deposited on Cu and, for comparison, model Si/SiO2 films were irradiated with VUV photons having energies and fluxes typically generated during plasma processing. It was found that the nature of the dielectric-substrate interface changes the number of trapped charges in the dielectric.…”
Section: Effect Of Dielectric-substrate Interface On Charge Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the photon flux density is the same for both exposures, this implies that the photoemission yield (photoemitted electrons per incident photon) is larger for the structures with the 10 nm thick HfO 2 surface layer. 28 Figure 6 shows two surface-potential maps measured across an oxidized wafer (without the HfO 2 coating). Typically, for unpatterned wafers during VUV irradiation, the rate of decrease of the current drawn by the substrate is inversely proportional to the increase in the surface potential.…”
Section: A Plasma-induced Charging Of Patterned Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%