2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the interactions between Pt species and ceria on Pt/ceria catalysts for water gas shift: The XPS studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore radius of the other catalysts and the increase of the ZrO2 promoter in the support were inversely proportionate to one another. The pore radii of the catalysts (type 2, 3, and 4) were 23.9 Å, 23.5 Å, and 23.2 Å, respectively [25]. These data showed that Pt,Pd,Ni/Mg0.85Zr0.15O catalyst with a high surface area recorded better performance in the DRM reaction compared with other catalysts.…”
Section: H2-tprmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The pore radius of the other catalysts and the increase of the ZrO2 promoter in the support were inversely proportionate to one another. The pore radii of the catalysts (type 2, 3, and 4) were 23.9 Å, 23.5 Å, and 23.2 Å, respectively [25]. These data showed that Pt,Pd,Ni/Mg0.85Zr0.15O catalyst with a high surface area recorded better performance in the DRM reaction compared with other catalysts.…”
Section: H2-tprmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…As previously observed, the interaction of Ni with a noble metal results in an easier reduction of the non-noble metal, shifting, at the same time, the characteristic reduction peaks towards lower temperatures than that observed for the Ni/CeO2-SiO2 sample [55]. Hydrogen spillover resulted in a total hydrogen uptake of 2735 μmol/gcat (Table 2, against a theoretical value of 2012 μmol/gcat): the enhancement of CeO2 reduction, observed at lower temperatures than that recorded over the bare support, is promoted by the metalssupport interaction, which weakened the Ce-O bond, thus increasing the mobility of lattice oxygen [56][57][58]. …”
Section: Catalysts Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Below 520 • C, Pt 0.8 /CeO 2 showed a higher H 2 yield. Pt favors CO adsorption on the catalyst surface and affects the reducible species on the support [13], promoting H 2 production by WGSR [28,44] (Equation (2)), which is favored at low temperature because it is an exothermic reaction [45]. Rh would also slightly favor WGSR [46].…”
Section: Effect Of the Rh-pt Ratio On The Catalytic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Rh promotes ethanol dehydrogenation with high CO formation (Equations (3) and (6)) [18]. On the contrary, Pt favors CO adsorption on the catalyst surface and affects reducible species on the support, promoting the formation of new active sites in the water gas shift reaction (WGSR) [27,28]. Yet, Pt has a lower capacity to break C-C bonds compared to Rh [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%