Despite these encouraging results, the performance of OFETs is still severely limited by factors such as contact resistance (R c ) [9] and charge trapping. [10] When the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) or the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of a p-type or n-type OSC, respectively, and the electrodes work-function are not aligned, charge injection is significantly hindered by the high energy barrier and high contact resistance values are extracted. [11] In order to confront these issues, different electrode engineering approaches have been proposed. For example, the work-function of the metal electrodes can be modified to match the OSC energy level by using self-assembled molecular monolayers (SAMs) in bottom-contact devices or by inserting a charge injection layer in top-contact OFETs. [12][13][14] Another source that prevents OSCs from realizing their instrinsic charge carrier mobilities is charge trapping. In the energy gap of OSCs, electronic states can appear due to the presence of chemical impurities or defects that trap mobile charge carriers, thus causing OFETs to deviate from the ideal behavior. [15] It has been previously reported that passivation of the dielectric layer or the use of OSC:insulating polymer blends are appealing routes to decrease the dielectric interfacial trap density. [16] Nonetheless, traps are also present at the metal-OSC interface, grain boundaries and thin film structural inhomogeneities. [15] Chemical doping is a suitable way to modify the electronic properties of OSCs, which consists in adding a small percentage of species able to donate (n-doping) or accept (p-doping) an electron to or from the OSC, respectively. Doping of semiconductors is a well-established strategy in inorganic transistors with great success also in organic optoelectronics, especially in OLEDs and solar cells. [17][18][19][20][21][22] Regarding OFET devices, doping has mainly been exploited to increase device mobility, adjust the threshold voltage, fill up trap states, or to improve charge injection by contact doping. [23] Although recent works have demonstrated that doping can be a key enabler for high performing OFETs, the progress of organic semiconductors doping is stillThe performance of organic field-effect transistors is still severely limited by factors such as contact resistance and charge trapping. Chemical doping is considered to be a promising key enabler for improving device performance, although there is a limited number of established doping protocols as well as a lack of understanding of the doping mechanisms. Here, a very simple doping methodo logy based on exposing an organic semiconductor thin film to an aqueous iodine solution is reported. The doped devices exhibit enhanced device mobility, which becomes channel-length independent, a decreased threshold voltage and a reduction in the density of interfacial traps. The device OFF current is not altered, which is in agreement with the spectroscopic data that points out that no charge transfer processes are occurring....