2000
DOI: 10.4141/a00-032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the substitution of urea for soybean meal on digestion in steers

Abstract: Kozloski, G. V., Ribeiro Filho, H. M. N. and Rocha, J. B. T. 2000. Effect of the substitution of urea for soybean meal on digestion in steers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 713-719. Four growing Holstein steers (305 ± 33 kg body weight) with ruminal and duodenal cannulae were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square experiment to assess the effect of level of dietary urea (0, 7.3, 14.7 and 22.0 g kg -1 of dry matter) on the site and extent of digestion of some feed components. The diets were isonitrogenous and consisted of 60% r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results in relation to post-ruminal N digestion have been inconsistent. In some reports, increasing urea in diets increased post-ruminal nitrogen digestibility (Zinn et al 1994, Kozloski et al 2000; in others, as in the present experiment, increasing urea levels in the diet had no effect on post-ruminal N compounds digestion (Zinn et al 2003. The difference on post-ruminal N digestion between reports is mainly due to the method of substitution of protein ingredients by urea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…However, results in relation to post-ruminal N digestion have been inconsistent. In some reports, increasing urea in diets increased post-ruminal nitrogen digestibility (Zinn et al 1994, Kozloski et al 2000; in others, as in the present experiment, increasing urea levels in the diet had no effect on post-ruminal N compounds digestion (Zinn et al 2003. The difference on post-ruminal N digestion between reports is mainly due to the method of substitution of protein ingredients by urea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…Each heifer received 10 g/day of chromium oxide mixed with concentrate for 10 days (from day 32 until day 41) with posterior feces collection on the last 5 days (from day 38 until day 42). The fecal production was calculated dividing chromium concentration (mg/kg) corrected by the mean recovery rate of 90.6% [22] in the feces by the amount supplied in the feed. DMI was calculated by dividing the fecal production by (1– in vitro digestibility of dry matter of the diet) [20, 23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain itu tingginya N-NH 3 pada jerami padi amoniasi (JPA) karena mengandung NPN yang tinggi akibat penambahan urea dan semua NPN didegradasi oleh enzim urease dalam rumen menjadi NH 3 dan CO 2 serta tersedianya karbohidrat fermentable. (Kozloski, et al, 2000) menyatakan bahwa peningkatan konsentrasi N-NH 3 rumen juga dipengaruhi oleh peningkatan pemberian urea. Hal ini sejalan dengan penelitian Puastuti, (2010) bahwa dengan pemberian jerami padi ditambah urea, molasses dan bungkil kedelai dapat meningkatkan konsentrasi N-NH 3 pada rumen kerbau namun pada penelitian Purba, (2009) konsentrasi N-NH 3 pada imbangan pemberian jerami amoniasi sebesar 42,5% dan onggok basah 23,5% yang diberikan sapi hanya menghasilkan N-NH 3 sebesar 7,82 mM.…”
Section: Konsentrasi N-nh 3 Dan Sintesis Protein Mikrobaunclassified