2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1296-2074(00)01078-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermal accelerated ageing on the properties of model canvas paintings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of a deacidification agent counteracts the acidity of a canvas and delays its chemical degradation (Poggi et al, 2013) and therefore its fragility (Seves et al, 2000). This is not a frequently used procedure, although a reassessment of its conservation cost-benefit might be timely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a deacidification agent counteracts the acidity of a canvas and delays its chemical degradation (Poggi et al, 2013) and therefore its fragility (Seves et al, 2000). This is not a frequently used procedure, although a reassessment of its conservation cost-benefit might be timely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 These cellulosic materials are known to be sensitive to acidity of their macromolecular environment, as acids accelerate the rate of hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in cellulose. 5 However, for painting canvases, no quantitative comparison between canvas quality and DP/pH exists, which would make it possible to interpret analytical results (the state of a material) in terms of conservation condition 6 of a piece of canvas. However, application of the primer, paint, glues, and absorption of acidic gases from the environment leads to acidication of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done with a pH meter (Mettler Toledo) using the cold extraction method and a capillary tube viscometer according to ISO standard 5353:2004. The canvas was thermally degraded for 9 days at 120 °C, at 130 °C for 6 days, and at 150 °C for 12 h. This staggered ageing was done due to time constraints and the need to achieve a set level of degradation, which was < 1000, as is usual for a degraded canvas (17). Achieving this level of degradation is more important than the method of degradation as the effect on DP is the same regardless of the method of degradation.…”
Section: Canvas Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%