2014
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2014.923042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermomechanical densification on surface roughness of wood veneers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When analysing the anatomical characteristics of densifi ed veneer, it was shown that wood morphology changed signifi cantly in the compression process. Earlier studies (Arruda and Del Menezzi, 2013;Bekhta et al, 2014) indicated that thermo-mechanical densifi cation improved surface quality of veneers with the surface becoming smoother, and roughness values decreasing signifi cantly. Roughness is closely related to wettability: the higher the roughness, the higher the surface hydrophilicity (Piao et al, 2010;Arnold, 2011).…”
Section: Rezultati I Raspravamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When analysing the anatomical characteristics of densifi ed veneer, it was shown that wood morphology changed signifi cantly in the compression process. Earlier studies (Arruda and Del Menezzi, 2013;Bekhta et al, 2014) indicated that thermo-mechanical densifi cation improved surface quality of veneers with the surface becoming smoother, and roughness values decreasing signifi cantly. Roughness is closely related to wettability: the higher the roughness, the higher the surface hydrophilicity (Piao et al, 2010;Arnold, 2011).…”
Section: Rezultati I Raspravamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the advantageous effect on properties such as strength, surface hardness and durability (Kutnar et al, 2008;Büyüksari et al, 2012;Büyüksari, 2013;Rautkari et al, 2013), surface quality of their aesthetic-decorative features could also be improved. The colour of wood becomes more attractive (Diouf et al, 2011), surface roughness decreases (Candan et al, 2010;Arruda and Del Menezzi, 2013;Bekhta et al, 2014), and the surface becomes glossier and smoother, while minimising the need for sanding. Despite the fact that thermal compression is an environmentally friendly process, after this treatment, the surface of the member becomes hydrophobic, which could result in serious problems during gluing or fi nishing.…”
Section: Introduction 1 Uvodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raw material has become a part of everyday life without people realizing its immense significance and benefits. Wood is a renewable source of energy, and is used in various forms in everyday activities (Bekhtam et al 2014;Gaff et al 2016;Gottlöber et al 2016). Processing wood into a usable material is a very complex technological process that has a long history (Kminiak and Gaff 2015;Kubš et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neese et al (2004) conducted similar experiments and noticed the same dependence. Improving the quality of veneer surface can be done by conducting additional technological processes such as sanding or veneer densification (Candan et al 2010;Bekhta et al 2017), which allow obtaining better veneer properties, among others lower surface roughness (Diouf et al 2011;Bekhta et al 2014). However, in industrial process monitoring of the surface roughness during the peeling process and decreasing the roughness to the optimal level by appropriate selection of technological parameters can be necessary to obtain an acceptable surface quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, methods of surface roughness measurement can be split into two categories: contact and non-contact. Methods from the first category are the most frequently used ones, and they are common in laboratory measurements, in particular for solid wood products (Kilic et al 2006;Thoma et al 2015), but also for wood veneers (Tanritanir et al 2006;Dundar et al 2008a;Candan et al 2010;Bekhta et al 2014). The main weakness of this approach is the contact between the fibers and the stylus, especially for fuzzy surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%