1983
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(83)80353-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of transition metal oxides on the thermal conductivity of glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A faster evaporation rate may create a localized dense concentration of protein at the surface of the hanging drop, resulting in a higher level of supersaturation at the surface and further extending the range of supersaturation to higher levels than that at 277 K. Another possible reason may be related to the volume change of the crystallisation drop. In a CTS programme, when the temperature of the heat source decreases, the actual temperature of the crystallisation drop will decrease faster than that of the reservoir solution due to the following reasons: a) the hanging drop's lower heat capacity compared to that of the reservoir solution, b) the higher thermal conductivity of the cover glass (~1.0 Wm -1 K -1 at room temperature) [27,28] compared to that of the plastic ware (polystyrene, ~0.14 Wm -1 K -1 at room temperature) [29] surrounding the reservoir solution, and c) sufficient thermal insulating material (the humid air, thermal conductivity ~ 0.025 Wm -1 K -1 at room temperature) [30] between the drop and the reservoir solution. As a result, when the heat source decreases in temperature, the water vapour will condensate on the colder crystallisation drop, resulting in an increase in the drop volume.…”
Section: Cts Can Induce Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A faster evaporation rate may create a localized dense concentration of protein at the surface of the hanging drop, resulting in a higher level of supersaturation at the surface and further extending the range of supersaturation to higher levels than that at 277 K. Another possible reason may be related to the volume change of the crystallisation drop. In a CTS programme, when the temperature of the heat source decreases, the actual temperature of the crystallisation drop will decrease faster than that of the reservoir solution due to the following reasons: a) the hanging drop's lower heat capacity compared to that of the reservoir solution, b) the higher thermal conductivity of the cover glass (~1.0 Wm -1 K -1 at room temperature) [27,28] compared to that of the plastic ware (polystyrene, ~0.14 Wm -1 K -1 at room temperature) [29] surrounding the reservoir solution, and c) sufficient thermal insulating material (the humid air, thermal conductivity ~ 0.025 Wm -1 K -1 at room temperature) [30] between the drop and the reservoir solution. As a result, when the heat source decreases in temperature, the water vapour will condensate on the colder crystallisation drop, resulting in an increase in the drop volume.…”
Section: Cts Can Induce Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivity of all the HGMs samples discussed in this work, with Zn percentage 0–10, was measured using C‐THERM TCi thermal conductivity analyzer and is tabulated in Table . The thermal conductivity increased from 0.072 to 0.203 (W/m‐K) when the zinc loading increased from 0 to 10% .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of silicate glasses, the influence of Ti, Co, Fe, Mn, Ni and Co on the thermal conductivity of a barium borosilicate glass, where it was shown that the conductivity increases with increasing atomic weight of the metallic species [22]; the addition of Cr to a lithium silicate composition in order to increase solar absorbance [23]; and the effect of various TMO additions at the 2 mol% level on the properties of a LZS glass [11]. Some studies have also been reported for non-silicate glasses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%