2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n6p1229-1238/2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Transportation Distance on Weight Losses in Pigs From Dehydration

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The increasing of global demand for food has required more efficiency in the production process. Transportation represents a source of body dehydration for pigs transported from farm to slaughterhouses. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the distances on the body dehydration of pigs transported to slaughter in tropical conditions. We analyzed 350 pigs shipments with a total of 68,588 heads using statistical software SAS by anova, means and corr procedures. The results showed a liveweight loss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This scenario, in addition to reducing the thermoregulation capacity of pigs, since heat dissipation through panting becomes inefficient (Nardone et al, 2010), can cause a high energy cost and result in excessive CO2 loss (Mota-Rojas et al, 2012), causing a drop in partial pressure and in the concentration of carbonic acid and hydrogen, which can increase the DOA rate (Tasse & Molento, 2019), dehydration (Machado et al, 2016) and time post-transport recovery of animals (Johnson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario, in addition to reducing the thermoregulation capacity of pigs, since heat dissipation through panting becomes inefficient (Nardone et al, 2010), can cause a high energy cost and result in excessive CO2 loss (Mota-Rojas et al, 2012), causing a drop in partial pressure and in the concentration of carbonic acid and hydrogen, which can increase the DOA rate (Tasse & Molento, 2019), dehydration (Machado et al, 2016) and time post-transport recovery of animals (Johnson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an animal will also experience weight loss when there is a lack of food and water. Machado et al (2016) estimate the rate of body weight loss can reach 12% of the initial weight of an animal. Body weight reduction is the most important economic effect because animal trade is usually based on body weight variables (Bravo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segundo Pilcher et al (2011), tempo de transporte com mais de 3 horas, são classificados como longos, enquanto na União Europeia para esta mesma classificação considera-se viagens acima de 8 horas (Brandt & Aaslyng, 2015). Em pesquisa realizada no Brasil o período de transporte para viagens de até 2,99 horas foi considerado como extra curto, entre 3 e 3,99 horas como curto, entre 4 e 7,99 horas como médio e acima de 8 horas como longo (Machado et al, 2016). Porém a mesma literatura destaca que a duração do transporte acaba por determinar aspectos negativos como privação de água e alimentos, estresse por calor e falta de oportunidade para descanso, comprometendo, portanto, o bemestar e parâmetros de qualidade de carne.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified