2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of turbulence characteristics in the atmospheric surface layer on the peak wind loads on heliostats in stow position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary layers were generated using two different sets of truncated spires and a staggered arrangement of roughness elements within a test section of 3 m × 3 m cross-section and 17 m development length at the University of Adelaide wind tunnel. Mean velocity and turbulence intensity profiles closely represent ESDU 85020 [8] profiles at the position of the instrumented heliostat model in Figure 1a with constant elevation axis height = 0.5 m and chord length = 0.8 m [9]. The mean velocity profiles of the two simulated ABLs are shown by Jafari et al [2] to approximate a logarithmic profile corresponding to a flat "open country" terrain ( 0 = 0.018 m) and a suburban terrain ( 0 = 0.35 m in Figure 1a) at measurement heights 0.15 m ≤ ≤ 0.65 m. Jafari et al [2] showed that the turbulence intensities in the longitudinal direction = / (13% and 26%) and vertical direction = / (9% and 11%) in the two simulated ABLs are within the allowable bandwidth of ±20% from the predicted values in ESDU 85020 [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The boundary layers were generated using two different sets of truncated spires and a staggered arrangement of roughness elements within a test section of 3 m × 3 m cross-section and 17 m development length at the University of Adelaide wind tunnel. Mean velocity and turbulence intensity profiles closely represent ESDU 85020 [8] profiles at the position of the instrumented heliostat model in Figure 1a with constant elevation axis height = 0.5 m and chord length = 0.8 m [9]. The mean velocity profiles of the two simulated ABLs are shown by Jafari et al [2] to approximate a logarithmic profile corresponding to a flat "open country" terrain ( 0 = 0.018 m) and a suburban terrain ( 0 = 0.35 m in Figure 1a) at measurement heights 0.15 m ≤ ≤ 0.65 m. Jafari et al [2] showed that the turbulence intensities in the longitudinal direction = / (13% and 26%) and vertical direction = / (9% and 11%) in the two simulated ABLs are within the allowable bandwidth of ±20% from the predicted values in ESDU 85020 [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Large variation in tests has been attributed to difference in Reynolds number, turbulence spectrum, geometric scaling ratio, etc. While studying the influence of turbulence characteristics on peak wind loads on heliostats, wind tunnel tests were performed, the turbulence intensity and size of the largest vortices had a noticeable effect on peak pressures, compared to other parameters Reynolds number [61]. For solar panels, peak pressures in the wind tunnel were underestimated compared to full-scale data [62].…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1(b), for instance the measured peak drag coefficient from the two studies differ by 30%. Furthermore, Emes et al (2017) found that the peak lift coefficient on a heliostat at zero elevation angle increased from 0.3 to 0.83 as the model characteristic length decreased from 0.8 m to 0.3 m at a constant turbulence intensity (𝐼 𝑢 =12.5%). The increase in the peak lift coefficient was attributed to the increase of the ratio of turbulent integral length scale to the model dimension (Emes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%