Effect of Two Different Dialysis Membranes on Leukocyte Adhesion and Aggregation

Abstract

Aims: We evaluated modifications in formation of heterotypic platelet-leukocyte aggregation induced by dialysis through cellulosic or synthetic membranes and evaluated the effects of such procedures promoting adhesive interactions between leukocytes and normal endothelial cells (ECs). Methods: Samples were obtained from arterial and venous lines at baseline, after 15 and 120 min of hemodialysis. Heterotypic aggregation was assessed using flow-cytometric techniques. Experiments to determine leukocyte adhesion to ECs were performed in parallel plate perfusion chambers at 450 s^–1. Results: Patients dialyzed with a cellulosic membrane showed a significantly higher baseline granulocyte heterotypic aggregation (median 22.5%, range 8.6–32%) versus healthy subjects (median 10%, range 3.2–14.6%; p < 0.05). Granulocyte heterotypic aggregation values remained increased throughout the hemodialysis session not only in the arterial line (median 18 and 24.5%, range 7–30 and 8.7–36% at 15 and 2 h, respectively) but also in the venous line (median 20 and 25%, range 8.6–32 and 11.5–35% at 15 min and 2 h, respectively). Basal lymphocytes heterotypic aggregation values observed in uremic patients were 6% (0.1–7.1%) versus 1.0% (0.5–2.8%) in the control group (p < 0.05). The increase remained during the hemodialysis session both in the arterial line (median 5 and 4%, range 0.2–14 and 0.5–7.1 % at 15 min and 2 h, respectively) and in the venous line (median 7 and 7%, range 1.4–14 and 0.5–10.6% at 15 min and 2 h). In contrast, patients dialyzed with a synthetic membrane showed a decreased basal granulocyte heterotypic aggregation compared to healthy subjects (median 3.5 vs. 10%, range 2.8–7 vs. 3.2–14.6%, respectively; p < 0.05). For lymphocytes, basal heterotypic aggregation values were 0.2% (range 0.1–0.5%) in dialyzed patients vs. 0.98% (range 0.5–2.8%) in healthy subjects (p < 0.05), without changes throughout the dialysis session. Changes in leukocyte adhesion during hemodialysis did not reach statistical significance with either hemodialysis membrane. Our studies confirm a differential activation of platelets and leukocytes depending on the nature of the dialysis membranes. However, activation of circulating cellular elements by hemodialysis procedures did not enhance cross-talk interactions between leukocytes and unaltered ECs.

microRNA-23b regulates the expression of inflammatory factors in vascular endothelial cells during sepsis

“…Vascular endothelial cells (VECs) serve as a vital interface between the blood and tissues. In the presence of inflammatory stimulation, the cells are activated and express adhesion molecules that play a critical role in leukocyte aggregation ( 5 ). Previous studies have shown that VECs are the major victim to pathogens and their toxins in sepsis.…”

Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis

“…Biocompatibility has been markedly improved in recent years by the production of more advanced membranes, but the foreign surfaces still lead to strong effects in the blood. Different types of dialysis membranes have been demonstrated to affect aggregation and activation of leukocytes to a varying degree [24,25]. The hydroxyl groups of plastic seem to play an important role in the activation of blood components, as indicated by studies demonstrating membranes with less hydroxyl groups to reduce the relative risk of mortality in DP [26].…”