2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00186.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of varying monoterpene concentrations on the response of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone: implications for pest management and ecology of bark beetles

Abstract: 1 Host plant terpenes can influence attraction of conifer bark beetles to their aggregation pheromones: both synergistic and inhibitory compounds have been reported. However, we know little about how varying concentrations of individual monoterpenes affect responses. 2 We tested a gradient of ratios of a-pinene, the predominant monoterpene in host pines in the Great Lakes region of North America, to Ips pini's pheromone, racemic ipsdienol plus lanierone. 3 Ips pini demonstrated a parabolic response, in which l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
98
3
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
98
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to synergists and inhibitors, bark beetles may also utilize "multifunctional" semiochemicals that are attractive or synergistic at low release rates but inhibitory at high ones (Rudinsky 1973;Borden et al 1987;Schlyter et al 1987a;Seybold et al 1992;Erbilgin et al 2003). Furthermore, bark beetle responses to certain attractive semiochemicals decline at very high release rates (Seybold et al 1992;Ross and Daterman 1998;Miller et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to synergists and inhibitors, bark beetles may also utilize "multifunctional" semiochemicals that are attractive or synergistic at low release rates but inhibitory at high ones (Rudinsky 1973;Borden et al 1987;Schlyter et al 1987a;Seybold et al 1992;Erbilgin et al 2003). Furthermore, bark beetle responses to certain attractive semiochemicals decline at very high release rates (Seybold et al 1992;Ross and Daterman 1998;Miller et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chrysobothris sexsignata, E. n. rufiventris, and T. nutalli occur in P. resinosa, P. banksiana, and P. strobus stands in the adjacent province of Ontario, Canada (Chénier and Philogène 1989), and I. latidens occurs in Ontario in P. strobus (Bright 1976). Enoclerus muttkowski, E. nigripes, T. undatulus, and Z. sanguineus occur in stands of P. resinosa in the adjacent state of Wisconsin Raffa 2000, 2005;Aukema et al 2000aAukema et al , b, 2004Erbilgin et al 2003) and Z. sanguineus may be associated with a hardwood tree (butternut), J. cinera, in Wisconsin (Katovich and Ostry 1998).…”
Section: Subcortical Insect Trap Catchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Dahlsten 1970;Stephen and Dahlsten 1976a, b); red pine, Pinus resinosa Ait. Raffa 2000, 2005;Aukema et al 2000aAukema et al , b, 2004Erbilgin et al 2003); sugar pine, Pinus lambertiana Dougl. (Dahlsten and Stephen 1974); and white spruce, Picea glauca (Moench) Voss (Whitmore 1982;Gara et al 1995;Haberkern et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resin flow represents the first step of tree resistance to attack by bole-invading bark beetles and their associated fungi [7] and a rapid flow can prevent the initial attacking beetles from entering a tree and establishing an attraction site from which aggregation pheromones can be released [32]. Further, the concentration of resin ducts in recent growth has been demonstrated to affect the ability of bark beetles to successfully colonize host trees [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%