2019
DOI: 10.5152/eurjther.2018.743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Vertical Growth Pattern on Maxillary and Frontal Sinus Sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Goymen et al claimed that the size of the frontal sinuses are not affected by a varied vertical growth pattern. This result conflicts with the theory that the size of the frontal sinus is altered by stresses forced by a harmonized occlusion [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…However, Goymen et al claimed that the size of the frontal sinuses are not affected by a varied vertical growth pattern. This result conflicts with the theory that the size of the frontal sinus is altered by stresses forced by a harmonized occlusion [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The increased frontal sinus size was associated with a reduced inclination of the anterior cranial base, increased anterior facial height, and gonial angle [ 14 - 16 ]. Goymen et al [ 17 ] could not find any relevance between the growth pattern and the size of the sinuses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Endo et al found that maxillary sinus length, maxillary sinus height, and total maxillary sinus area showed significant positive correlations with upper anterior facial height by evaluating the lateral cephalometric images [ 9 ]; Ryu et al also found that the patients with an anterior open bite have greater maxillary sinus height and more vertical pneumatization of the maxillary sinus floor in the posterior tooth root region than the patients without anterior open bite [ 10 ]. On the other hand, Göymen et al stated there was no difference in maxillary sinus sizes among patients with different vertical patterns [ 11 ]; Kosumarl et al also did not find a significant difference in the distance from the maxillary root apices of posterior teeth to the floor of the maxillary sinus between subjects with a skeletal open bite or skeletal normal bite [ 12 ]. However, Oksayan et al concluded that patients with a low-angle vertical facial pattern have larger maxillary sinus dimensions than patients with a high-angle vertical facial pattern [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%