“…Temperature (TEMP) (11), skin conductance level (SCL) (12), electrogastrography (EGG) (13), and heart rate variability (14) obtained solely from body surface recordings have a long history as objective indicators for assessing MS susceptibility, and Gavgani et al found that SCL in the forehead was the best physiological correlate of VIMS-induced nausea symptoms (15). Objective assessments of MS susceptibility based on the results of vestibular function tests, such as the vestibulo-ocular reflex for different vestibular receptors (16)(17)(18), vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (19)(20)(21), and computerized dynamic posturography (22), are gradually becoming the focus of research, among them, the gain asymmetry of the video head impulse test, the nystagmus slowphase velocity evoked by the caloric test and the amplitude of the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential vary in groups of participants with different susceptibility to MS. Functional brain assessments, such as electroencephalogram (23,24), functional magnetic resonance imaging (25,26) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (27,28), have facilitated the objective assessment of MS susceptibility at the level of higher nerve centers, meanwhile, the correlation between the intensity of activity in certain brain regions during MS exposure and the degree of MS discomfort have been confirmed by several studies. In addition, the levels of arginine vasopressin, ghrelin and immunoglobulins in blood after MS exposure have been found to correlate with the severity of MS (29,30), while the discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphism and chromosomes associated with MS susceptibility provides new alternatives for the assessment of MS susceptibility (31,32).…”