2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00204.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation

Abstract: Saijo N, Gomi H. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SD range for the TJR directional differences was 16.1–37.8 degrees (Figure 4 ). These values are considerably larger than those of previous studies evaluated at longer-latencies of over 200 ms (Johnson et al, 2002 ; Johnson and Haggard, 2005 ; Sarlegna and Blouin, 2010 ; Brière and Proteau, 2011 ; Saijo and Gomi, 2012 ). This indicates that spatial TJR accuracy was too low to produce fine hand trajectory control.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The SD range for the TJR directional differences was 16.1–37.8 degrees (Figure 4 ). These values are considerably larger than those of previous studies evaluated at longer-latencies of over 200 ms (Johnson et al, 2002 ; Johnson and Haggard, 2005 ; Sarlegna and Blouin, 2010 ; Brière and Proteau, 2011 ; Saijo and Gomi, 2012 ). This indicates that spatial TJR accuracy was too low to produce fine hand trajectory control.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Also, studies that manipulate experimental conditions, such as the complexity of the perturbation [5] show changes in width of generalization. Moreover, uncertainty has been shown to affect learning [31], [36] and retention [36], in particular learning of visuomotor rotations [18], [37]. As uncertainty is important for all of these other aspects of motor learning, it may well affect generalization patterns as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one factor that has not yet been studied in the context of generalization experiments is uncertainty. Many studies have explored how uncertainty affects behavior [1], [16], [17], [18], but how uncertainty influences generalization has received little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas a no-vision condition is generally considered as providing no feedback, and thus no "new sensory evidence" with which to adjust behavior, participants could still rely on proprioceptive information to plan, control, and evaluate the outcome of their movements. Interestingly, it is well documented that visuomotor adaptation is accompanied by proprioception recalibration (Cressman and Henriques 2009;Simani et al 2007), and a recent study showed that variance in exposed rotations tends to reduce the degree of proprioceptive recalibration (Saijo and Gomi 2012). Specifically, the authors investigated proprioceptively guided online control by using probe trials in which vision was unpredictably removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, the drift toward baseline during the present no-vision phase may have been attributable to a proprioceptively driven task error (i.e., the comparison between final hand position and target position), and the different rate at which this occurred across groups may have been a result of differences in proprioceptive recalibration. In this framework, given that variance in exposed rotations 1) makes the sensorimotor system rely less on the prior and more on new sensory evidence (Wei and Körding 2010) and 2) reduces the degree of proprioceptive recalibration (Saijo and Gomi 2012), it would follow that higher levels of variance in exposed rotations led to a faster reversion toward nonadapted behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%