2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of water and geological factors on the long-term stability of fracture zones in the Päijänne Tunnel, Finland: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the complexity of geological formations, variations in the mechanical properties of rocks/soils surrounding a tunnel, and the highly indeterminate characteristics of a tunnel's structure, the behavior of a tunnel, including those under construction or in operation, usually varies among different locations (Lipponen et al, 2005;Kim and Eisenstein, 2006). Many factors can affect tunnel stability, resulting in various anomalies on the lining structure of a tunnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of geological formations, variations in the mechanical properties of rocks/soils surrounding a tunnel, and the highly indeterminate characteristics of a tunnel's structure, the behavior of a tunnel, including those under construction or in operation, usually varies among different locations (Lipponen et al, 2005;Kim and Eisenstein, 2006). Many factors can affect tunnel stability, resulting in various anomalies on the lining structure of a tunnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage often appears in tunnel structures, which may affect the stability of the tunnel [3,4]. However, the cause of tunnel damage is not easily identified due to various complex influencing factors [5,6]. In view of previous studies, tunnel structures are mainly suffered from harsh geological or topographical environments around the tunnel site [7][8][9], insufficient bearing capacity [10], unexpected external load [11,12], and degraded material properties [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the technical considerations also had an impact and consequently the lack of reinforcement does not necessarily mean that there is no fracturing. The proportion of steel-mesh or bolt reinforcement was found to explain approximately 65% of the variation in the rate of groundwater inflow in the tunnel sec-tions between 58.9 and 112.2 km, as discussed in further detail by Lipponen et al (2005).…”
Section: Features Governing the Groundwater Inflow Into The Päijänne mentioning
confidence: 83%