Effect of window size on detection acuity and resolution acuity for sinusoidal gratings in central and peripheral vision

Abstract

Detection and resolution of square patches of sinusoidal gratings were measured in central and peripheral vision (30 degrees horizontal temporal visual field) for high-contrast gratings as a function of the number of cycles in the stimulus. We determined performance in a forced-choice paradigm for a fixed number of stimulus cycles by arranging for stimulus diameter to vary inversely with spatial frequency. For both psychophysical tasks and for both target locations, the psychometric function relating performance to log spatial frequency shifted to higher frequencies without changing slope significantly as the number of cycles in the stimulus was increased. Thus the entire effect could be captured by an analysis of spatial acuity, which increased with increasing number of grating cycles over the range 0.5-6 cycles but remained constant over the range 6-14 cycles. In the central field, resolution acuity and detection acuity were equal regardless of the number of cycles in the stimulus. In the peripheral field, detection acuity exceeded resolution acuity and perceptual aliasing occurred for stimuli in the range 1-14 cycles. From this result we conclude that resolution acuity is sampling limited in the periphery, provided that the stimulus contains at least one full cycle of the grating. Essential features of the results could be accounted for by Fourier analysis of the stimulus.

Parafoveal letter recognition at reduced contrast in normal aging and in patients with risk factors for AMD

“…In addition, if the experimental paradigm requires not only detection, as in perimetry, but discrimination of stimuli, the task gets harder and perceptual thresholds increase, in accordance with previous reports [48][49][50].…”

Spatial contrast sensitivity of birds

“…For example, the number of cycles that are displayed in a stimulus has been shown to determine CS (Savoy and McCann, 1975;Hoekstra, van der Goot, van den Brink, and Bilsen, 1974) and acuity (Anderson, Evans, and Thibos, 1996) for targets containing six or less cycles. Savoy and McCann, and…”

Thresholds for Sampled Sloan Letters Are Smaller Than Sample Spacing

“…However, the Fourier spectra and difference spectra of simpler targets such as truncated gratings and illiterate E stimuli have been used to explain the differences in visibility between extended and truncated gratings and a finding that in peripheral vision, acuity with illiterate E's is better than with truncated gratings of a similar fundamental frequency. 24,25 Over the past decade a number of authors have tried to predict the retinal sampling limits for letter acuity. The impetus for this comes from improvements in correcting higher order monochromatic aberrations, either by adaptive optics or by refractive surgery, which has the potential to improve the contrast of higher spatial frequency information being sampled by the retina.…”