2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0919-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parafoveal letter recognition at reduced contrast in normal aging and in patients with risk factors for AMD

Abstract: Using parafoveal test locations, a recognition task and diminished contrast increases the chance of early detection of functional defects due to eARM or nfAMD and can differentiate them from those due to aging alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include high-pass resolution perimetry (Frisén, 1993(Frisén, , 1995, component perimetry (Bachmann & Fahle, 2000), frequency doubling perimetry (e.g., Chauhan & Johnson, 1999;Spry, Johnson, McKendrick, & Turpin, 2001;Wall, Neahring, & Woodward, 2002), flicker perimetric methods (cf. Rota-Bartelink, 1999 for review), methods that include a recognition task like MacKeben's Macular Mapping Test (Hahn et al, 2009), microperimetry, and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO; Mainster, Timberlake, Webb, & Hughes, 1982;Rohrschneider, Springer, Bültmann, & Völcker, 2005), as well as objective techniques like the multifocal electroretinogram (Sutter & Tran, 1992). Some of the techniques and implemented test algorithms are briefly reviewed by McKendrick (2005).…”
Section: Perimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include high-pass resolution perimetry (Frisén, 1993(Frisén, , 1995, component perimetry (Bachmann & Fahle, 2000), frequency doubling perimetry (e.g., Chauhan & Johnson, 1999;Spry, Johnson, McKendrick, & Turpin, 2001;Wall, Neahring, & Woodward, 2002), flicker perimetric methods (cf. Rota-Bartelink, 1999 for review), methods that include a recognition task like MacKeben's Macular Mapping Test (Hahn et al, 2009), microperimetry, and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO; Mainster, Timberlake, Webb, & Hughes, 1982;Rohrschneider, Springer, Bültmann, & Völcker, 2005), as well as objective techniques like the multifocal electroretinogram (Sutter & Tran, 1992). Some of the techniques and implemented test algorithms are briefly reviewed by McKendrick (2005).…”
Section: Perimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A macular mapping test using a similar but more elaborate paradigm was developed with the aim of more accurately plotting a patient's residual functional vision. 21 This test uses a large spoke-like target that is assumed to stimulate foveal fixation; the sizes of the surrounding letter targets are scaled with eccentricity based on this assumption. The results of this test and the clock-dial test become less interpretable when the retinal location of fixation is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include changes to contrast sensitivity [9][10][11], colour vision [12][13], flicker sensitivity [13][14], temporal thresholds [15][16][17], microperimetry [11,[18][19], photostress or glare recovery [11,[20][21][22] and dark adaptation [12][13][14][23][24][25][26]. When measured alongside these other visual functions, dark adaptation abnormalities have emerged as the most sensitive markers for early AMD [12][13][14]23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%