2019
DOI: 10.3382/japr/pfz066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of β-Mannanase Supplementation in Conventional Diets on the Performance, Immune Competence and Intestinal Quality of Broilers Challenged With Eimeria sp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have investigated the utility of feed enzymes as a strategic alternative to complement deficient enzymes due to coccidiosis infection. [104,198]. Dietary supplementation with β-mannanase in chickens challenged with commercial live-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine (20x) increased the proportions of beneficial intestinal groups, such as Lactobacillus, Ruminococcaceae, and Akkermansia, and decreased Bacteroides, which is responsible for poor feed efficiency in chickens [104].…”
Section: Organic Acids and Other Feed Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies have investigated the utility of feed enzymes as a strategic alternative to complement deficient enzymes due to coccidiosis infection. [104,198]. Dietary supplementation with β-mannanase in chickens challenged with commercial live-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine (20x) increased the proportions of beneficial intestinal groups, such as Lactobacillus, Ruminococcaceae, and Akkermansia, and decreased Bacteroides, which is responsible for poor feed efficiency in chickens [104].…”
Section: Organic Acids and Other Feed Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary supplementation with β-mannanase in chickens challenged with commercial live-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine (20x) increased the proportions of beneficial intestinal groups, such as Lactobacillus, Ruminococcaceae, and Akkermansia, and decreased Bacteroides, which is responsible for poor feed efficiency in chickens [104]. Furthermore, although it did not affect the productive performance of chickens, supplementation with β-mannanase improved intestinal health, measured by improved villi, namely the crypt proportion and increased number of goblet cells in the intestinal mucosa [198]. Dersjant-Li et al indicated that the damage and performance losses induced by coccidiosis could be reduced by using enzymes in combination with Bacillus spp.…”
Section: Organic Acids and Other Feed Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides enhancing the growth performances and promoting health of poultry, feed supplementation with Bacillus could also improve the meat quality (increase in meat lightness, redness and yellowness) [117] and eggs (increase in eggshell strength and thickness, yolk color score, Haugh unit, and decrease in cholesterol content of yolk) [118]. Bacillus can limit influence from toxin Phytase Bacillus subtilis US417 Phytic acid Releases phosphorus (P) from phytates contributing to better bioavailability of P and vital minerals and enhancement of growth performance and health of animals along with environment protection [109] Keratinase Bacillus subtilis S14 Keratin Degrades keratin and improve digestion [110] Mannanase Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 10A1 Mannans Contributes to degradation of NSP and decreases intestinal chyme viscosity increasing animal production performance [111] in contaminated broilers feed and decrease emission of NH 3 from poultry manure [23]. The increase in gut permeability caused by several enteric pathogens such as Salmonella spp results damage in the intestinal tight junction that referred as "'leaky gut"' [119].…”
Section: In Poultrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huawei has won its unique market position with its firm corporate culture and position, and its service has been well received by the service providers and has not affected Huawei's own reputation because of its blindness and pursuit of interests. In modern enterprises, departments are sharply divided and have different roles [1]. In any organization, middle managers in the middle position should keep up with the leadership requirements of superiors, and manage the staff at the grass-roots level below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%